| "A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader. " ~Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779 [1828 Webster Dictionary: "Virtue is nothing but voluntary obedience to truth".] "The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." ~Thomas Jefferson |
DEFACTO CITIZEN GUIDE TO STATE GOVERNMENT This guide has all the contact information for our Defacto Michigan Congress, find your District and
harvest the info.
CITIZENS RULE BOOK (A Juror's Handbook)
A Layman's Guide To Jury Nullification - Liberty Crier YOU HAVE POWER IN THE JURY BOX
Jury Nullification is something you're not told about but it is your RIGHT as jurors to implement. Of course the judges do not want you to know this because they get
paid huge money for judgments processed through their courts. It is your duty to JUDGE THE LAW AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE JUDGING THE DEFENDANT,
and perhaps judge the law first if it is a constitutional law that left a "victim" in its wake. The state can NOT be the victim!
You have power in the JURY BOX...one of the ways to over-turn tyranny is in the JURY BOX... do not avoid jury duty..accept it and bring true justice to the people...
do NOT listen to what the Judge INSTRUCTS you to do..just remember if there is ".no victim there is no crime" no matter what the facts say. That is the foundation
of our Constitution and Bill of Rights...Please watch this very informative video on a layman's guide to jury nullification:
http://libertycrier.com/u-s-constitution/a-laymans-guide-to-jury-nullification/
This page is now Archived
March 06, 2013 LETTER TO THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN -Sent out by email
A Letter to the people of Michigan:
It has been brought to my attention by my Savior Jesus Christ, the one and only King of Kings, that it is time for me to return to my original direction of serving the
people as they learn to manage their own health. I completed my doctorate in naturopathy, my BS in natural health, a certificate program in Family Herbals and a
certificate program in RBTI and then found myself on this de jure republic path momentarily. The path of natural health/healing, and freedom/liberty are intertwined
because both come from our Creator. It is time for me to set one aside for a season to serve the people that presently have the greater need, which is quality of life
through natural health practices.
In parting I’d like to say, I don’t think many understand the significance of sending (email & USPS) the Notice to all of Michigan’s Defacto Congress along with
Publishing it in the Detroit Free Press. They've been given notice that the people of Michigan do NOT acquiesce to the decree by HLS that Michigan is now a
Constitution Free Zone. I did not get a response from any of them addressing this most serious issue. I received one reply from Benishek and it was in reference to
the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act. When I receive the Tear Sheet from the Free Press I will post it on the page with the NOTICE. Perhaps some day someone
with the wherewithal to do something will find it useful. I will be removing the names from the notice and preservation act pages, but the locations will stay, and the
news page will go into archive status after this letter is posted. The website will remain and maybe from time to time I will add something to the resource page if it
important information.
It is time for me to start building my Manage Health Naturally practice to serve the people in a greater capacity than what I’ve been able to by doing what I’ve been
doing. I’m not going anywhere and I am an American, so patriotism runs through my blood, however, first and foremost I am a child of God and it is to Him I serve,
because it is only my service to Him that makes it possible for me to serve others by Faith with Love anchored in Truth. It is time for the Gospel of Jesus Christ and
His healing powers to be shared with others because it is His Kingdom that will be coming to Earth and will overcome evil, not by our works but by His grace.
It has been a blessing to have known some of you, even meeting in person, and to have phone conversations with others. Do not let the troubles of this world get you
down, return to building relationships and speaking with people, your neighbors, family, friends, and co-workers face to face because by doing this our de jure republic
will spring forth naturally by virtue of the people, which is them voluntarily seeking truth because of the love and kindness shown them by each of us. People are
hurting and need our help in their present circumstances. Information from the Matrix has no value to them but to do the complete opposite of what you hope to
accomplish by sharing it with them. I’m still here, I’m just returning to my original path that parallels this one, and unfortunately there isn’t enough time nor energy for
both. I intend to supplement my natural health education by including the Royal Rife Frequency technology and this will require a great deal of my time.
I want to thank each of you for all you’ve done and the help you’ve given. I pray peace, love, and joy that passes all understanding will come upon you, and your
families, and where this is sickness health will be found in a renewing of the spirit. Amen.
In God Is Our Trust,
Bonnie Frownfelter
[My final note which wasn't included in the above letter but feel compelled to say this due to everything that flies around cyberspace: I did not make this decision as a
result of coercion, threat, or bribery. I wasn't visited by black helicopters because of
March 02, 2013 HLS CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE - Inquiry sent to Rep Mike Shirkey, Rep Matt Lori, and Sen. John Proos
----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: "State Rep Mike Shirkey" <MikeShirkey@house.mi.gov>; "Rep. Matt Lori (District 59)" <dist059@house.mi.gov>; "John Proos"
<senjproos@senate.michigan.gov>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: HLS Constitution free zone
COMMUNICATION WITH REP. MIKE SHIRKEY
----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65)
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
The Best Guns And Freedom Video Around (0nly 7.5 minutes)
In short order, this video slices through the spin and clearly exposes the truth about gun control. So tastefully done it will open the eyes of many a fence sitter who's
started noticing the bad smell coming from DC. VIDEO [link below]
Grace and Peace,
-Bob
~submitted by Robert L
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_T-F_zfoDqI
Just fair warning, this one is a tad bit long, even for me.
My last article garnered a comment from someone I know that proves that I was right when I said that most people couldn’t name even five of the rights protected by
the Bill of Rights. This person, who I won’t mention, but who knows who they are, said that I was nuts because we can still exercise all our rights. So I asked them to
name five of the rights, just as the article said. The first thing they said was freedom of speech, followed by a long pause. So I prodded, what else? Then they blurted
out I plead the fifth. To which I replied, you ought to before you make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have. Of course that didn’t go over too well, but it
proved my point that most people CAN’T name the rights which our Founders felt were so important that they listed them individually in the Bill of Rights
.READ MORE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INTERNET KEEPING KIDS FROM GRANDPARENTS
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxxx@att.net
To: Bonnie
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Internet Keeping Kids from Grandparents
[My thought: I decided to post this because it speaks volumes to what has happened across our country. A sense of family, values, virtue, principles and our
American Heritage is no longer being passed along from generation to generation. Our children are no longer being taught the true history of our founding but instead
are being programmed by the propaganda machine referred to as state (public) schools. So, if our heritage from our parents and grandparents is being replaced with the
Internet, we've truly lost our nation folks. We are just as complicit for failing to protect our children from those that will use them for profit and power<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RUSSIA BANS IMPORTS OF US BEEF, POULTRY - COMMENT SENT TO SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RERE GUN LAWS - Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: Bonnie
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: rere gun laws
Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
I think this goes back to when they started the barrel and stock length rules.shot gun 18 and 8 rifle 16 and 8. This was done to discourage the gangsters short 12 ga
pistol etc. BTW one that is cut at the pistol grip and for end will have a bad muzzle jump while one that is just legal length will do a fine job and handle fast enough.
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 28, 2013 ONE OF THE PEOPLE SPEAKING OUT - REPLY TO PHIL CAVANAGH
From: Melissa
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:54 PM
To: Bonnie
Subject: Re: FW: info
I have received a response from one of the reps and I have written him back.
Phil Cavanagh,
"there are a number of bills that deal with various aspects of firearm regulation including weapon free zones". Do you realize that there is a law called the Dick Act of
1903, which states that there is no law that shall take away the second amendment. Are all of you, as representatives confused about who put you in office and why?
There should be absolutely NO LAWS that impede or take away the second amendment, and that includes assault rifles. Where is your authority? The people did not
give you that power. "While I support the 2nd amendment and all rights guaranteed by the Constitution, I believe that weapons capable of such mass destruction can be
regulated without impinging upon our Constitutional rights." In this statement I hear a lot of "I support, and I believe. There are a lot of I's in your answer, sir. Again,
your opinion is not the reason that you are in the position that you are in and why "WE THE PEOPLE" are paying your huge salary as many are out of work and can
barely feed their children. OUR OPINION IS THE ONLY OPINION THAT SHOULD SHINE THROUGH WHEN A BILL OR A DISCUSSION COMES UP IN THE
STATE CONGRESS!! Again, you are confused as to the duty of your stay in office which is only because others put you there. We continue to get these type of
letters back from representatives that state thank you for your opinion and I will try to keep it in mind when "I" make a decision. Please keep this in mind that "WE
THE PEOPLE" have sat back and allowed unchecked power to grow like a cancer but now we are growing in numbers and there will be a major house cleaning of
representatives that have THEIR OWN OPINION and AGENDA'S, which are controlled by lobbyists. No more!
Also, where is my letter or statement from you about the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and a so called, "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE" in the state
of Michigan. "WE THE PEOPLE" did not vote on this POWER GRAB and most people do not even understand or know that it exists. This information has gone viral
and it will catch on. I am expecting an explanation as to why this has come to fruition and what you sir, Phil Cavanagh have done to stop DHS whom has no authority
whatsoever, via the tenth amendment. If this is allowed to happen what will you be doing for an occupation and to feed your children? I will be looking forward to
your detailed explanation to these questions. I have posted all letters, including mine from Representatives on the internet for "WE THE PEOPLE" to view.
Sincerely,
Melissa
Concerned Citizen of the state of Michigan and "WE THE PEOPLE" -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO UCC 1-308
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FEED A FAMILY OF FOUR FOR ONE YEAR FOR LESS THAN $300
This plan is THE fastest, cheapest and easiest way to start a food storage program. You are done in a weekend. AND there are no hassles with rotating. Pack it and
forget. It’s space efficient – everything is consolidated into a few 5-gallon buckets. You’ll sleep content in knowing that you have a one-year food supply on hand for
your family should you ever need. READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard
[My thought: This could be used for low income families on a fixed income to stretch their ability to feed their family, especially if cuts to food stamps take place. As a
Naturopathy doctor I live by this rule, " I eat to survive, I don't survive to eat".<><]
February 26, 2013 2ND Amendment Preservation Act Email Conversation between Mr. Forster and Rep. Mike Shirkey, District 65 PDF
As with most email dialogues that are forwarded, one must scroll down, then scroll back up while reading for the correct order of the conversation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I filled out a web form for Congressman Benishek and Representative Kivela for District 1 on both issues. I only received a thank you from Rep.Kivela but here is the
read back from Congressman Benishek 2nd Amendment Constitution Free Notice
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LIST OF DEFACTO REPRESENTATIVES EMAIL CONTACT ADDRESSES DOC
All the names and email addresses are listed in the Doc above. Just copy and paste your District Representative. A big "thank you" to Cathy for the time spent
gathering all the names and addresses.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ron Paul: “When They Came For The Raw Milk Drinkers…”
——————————
February 25, 2013 The Doc Swat Team Milk Raid—While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be disarmed: ——
Federal Agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty. Too often
Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and the federal bureaucracy.
For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s founder, 65-year
old James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese to willing customers – in a state
where raw milk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit!
www.silverdoctors.com/ron-paul-when-they-came-for-the-raw-milk-drinkers/#more-22176
From what I've read they took the farms inventory of thousands of dollars and the farm is now filing for bankruptcy– Where else can a thing like this happen– besides a
free country like America —-
~submitted by Edge—
[My thought: This is the tyranny that is going on daily across our country and the people cower away and allow innocent hard-working people to lose all they have
because they are competition for the mega corporations. These are the real criminals and I agree with Ron Paul, if anyone should be disarmed it is these Federal
Agencies that are terrorizing innocent Americans that are just trying to survive. We all need to revisit our Declaration of Independence I think <><]
February 25, 2013 RUGER HAS MADE IT SIMPLE
-----Original Message-----
From: isaiah
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:17 AM
To: XXXXX
Subject: Re: Ruger has made it simple
Governor, but at least your Representatives, and send them separately so as not to confuse the two very serious issues. Beware of BIG CORPORATIONS, and it is
best to independently as THE PEOPLE to give Congress a DIRECTIVE first hand, not through one of THEIR SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS. Our Constitutional
Rights do not come from CORPORATE POLICIES. If we play their game it is feeding the corporate beast, as THE PEOPLE, lets stop doing this and let our unalienable
rights be the foundation we stand on and demand they honor their oaths or step down from their "governance" of the people.. This is how we restore our de jure
republic. Link for defacto state citizen guide above for your convenience. <><]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Smart Meters" & EMR: The Health Crisis Of Our Time - Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt VIDEO
I sent this to our city manager, Senator Vincent Gregory and Vicki Barnett. I will, time willing, send to all the representatives. ~submitted by Cathy C
[My note: If you are pregnant, planning to have children, know someone that is, or already have children it would behoove you to watch the above video for the sake of
your child's health as well as your own. Please become proactive in managing your own health and that of your children. Follow Cathy's lead and do the same, send
this information to your representatives. They need to hear from the people that we are NOT going to quietly go along with this destruction created by big corporations
for profit <><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority -(NSEA) WISHES TO ALIGN WITH International Common Law Court of Justice -(ITCCS)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Murphy
Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Subject: NSEA wishes to aline with ITCCS
To: hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com
3 ATTACHMENTS: Notice to Clerk of District Court 2-8013- Full Notice Clean Water Contingency Program 2012 Sewer Rats
Dear Secretariat,
Please convey to Kevin Annett our wish for the National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority’s (“NSEA”) to align with ITCCS so as to convene our common law
courts in alignment with and under the same name of International Common Law Court of Justice. We at NSEA have developed a notice and contract document
(attached) to serve to all the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTs in America. Currently, grand jury quorums of a pool of twenty-three (23) are being formed in
every State by our people in every State. A tribunal of three justices will be selected from the pool [of non-U.S. citizens] to hear any case regarding crimes against
humanity and genocide.
We will be bringing actions against public servants (employees of private corporations impersonating public servants) who are complicit with the crimes of genocide
being perpetrated upon the American people by knowingly contributing to the poisoning of the people’s drinking water resources in violation of the Public Law 92-500
Clean Water Act. The UNITED STATES “UNLAWFUL” WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, owned by the Vatican and dba the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and
STATE governments, has been operating in violation of the Clean Water Act now for over 40 years. It is the one crime they are all guilty of….and it is a “strict
liability” statute that attached criminal penalties. We have already completed an investigative report on Janet Napolitano, who was found to have a slush fund in the
Vatican Bank as the result of your efforts, for extorting of the people of Lake Havasu City of $1.8 Billion dollars when she was Attorney General and Governor of
Arizona. She is going to be one of the first…along with Obama and company. I also wish to confirm if the USEPA Administrator Lisa Jackson had a slush fund in the
Vatican Bank.
The so-called UNITED STATES [INC.] government impersonators are actually doing business as a Vatican owned, co-corporation of the London municipal
wastewater management utility since 1871, also known as the UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY that has been unlawfully operating since July 1, 1973.
Over 35,000 people each month (just in America, NOT including Canada) are dying from just cancer due to toxic/acidic drinking water conditions as a result of this
grave omission/refusal of these Vatican Criminal Genocidests to administer federal health code, the at-source containment and control required by the congressionally
mandated regulations of the Clean Water Act, and that is JUST the beginning.
Since 40% of all municipal revenue nationally was the result to wastewater management revenues, Nixon, a member of the bar…who is in fact the ones put in power to
protect the Vatican/Crown/City of London/IMF investments, specifically the largest industry in the world, the $500 Billion dollar a year UNITED STATES
WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, put the BAR in charge of all “courts,” in actuality… mere “administrative agencies” having ZERO judicial authority. The people NEVER
gave judicial powers to “private corporations.” The U.S. courts, from the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS, the
STATE SUPERIOR COURTS and MUNICIPAL COURTS are the “gate keepers” charged to “get rid of” any action that would threaten their criminal UNITED
STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY racketeering influenced corrupt organization (“R.I.C.O.”) run enterprise.
The BAR is charged with protecting and maintaining the unlawful wastewater management practice of poisoning the people feeding their other primary criminal
enterprises, i.e. insurance, health care and pharmaceutical, all to create unjust enrichments and ill-gotten gains. If they had complied with the Clean Water Act of 1972
[spurred by JFK], they would have been out of business by 1985, the year all public sewers were to be outlawed as the primary national goal of the United States
Congress as defined in the Clean Water Act.
Further, as a member of the “wastewater industry” since 1972, I am a federal witnesses to their unlawful practice of knowingly unlawfully discharging 65 plus known
toxic pollutants/hazardous substances associated with domestic sewage, listed on the USEPA Toxic Pollutant List, uncontained and uncontrolled (as mandated by the
Clean Water Act), at every onshore facility in north America, including Canada, such to be operating in compliance with the requirements of the congressionally
mandated standards of performance and pretreatment requirements of the Clean Water Act. However, only approximately 20 onshore facilities are containing and
controlling these poisons. This mission of genocide, premeditated murder upon the people of America and Canada, is controlled by the Vatican “sewer rats.” They
have knowingly, with intent to harm, converted every home, i.e. or building having a toilet, into a “chemical and biological weapon of mass destruction,” unlawfully
discharging poisons by exfiltration and direct discharge into our nations drinking water resources. Now, you have exposed them to be what we have been claiming.
We have already conveyed to the public in several documentations over the past two years (see attached) the enemy is the Vatican, International Monetary Fund, City
of London, the Crown, and the Guild of London from which comes all members of the BAR who are controlling America right now, killing, stealing and destroying
“us.”
What you have recently done is awesome! Thank you!
We at NSEA.US wish to support and expand the mission of ITCCS into the true united states for America. In order to do that, we wish to provide the name of our
court in Section 3.4 of the “notice-contract” (attached) which will be sent to the district courts, to be defined as: The International Court of Record of Justice. NSEA
has already executed a joint powers agreement with the 11th tribe of the Cherokee Republic and have been adopted as an Elder advisor to the tribe.
Accordingly, “International” is also the proper identification of venue for our court of record. We wish to align with you and your program and assist in your pursuit
of justice. We could implement the “North America Reclamator Program.” The program would restore government, clean water, good health and economic stability
throughout North America. Additionally, our “New Water Source Utility” has been approved to receive “debt forgiven funds” of up to $180 Billion available to
implement technology that transforms raw sewage into pure potable healthy water and generates enough electricity to sustain a home. However, we must first get
these government imposters out of our way. This is why the people must be able to convene their common law courts.
We would also hope that the alignment of NSEA and ITCCS could also bring a certain level of benefit to your efforts. For us, we see the relationship to be very
beneficial to both parties and in the interest of mankind at large. For this reason, we wish to have your blessings on our using the name of the court, International
Common Law Court of Record.
Please contact me pursuant to the information below to discuss further.
Keep up the good work and may God bless you,
Tom Murphy
Private Attorney-General
National Standards Enforcement Authority
“an in capita sovereign body authority of the people”
http://www.nsea.us/
http://www.reclamator.com/
775-848-8800
~submitted by Cathy C
February 24, 2013 STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT - MICHIGAN CONGRESS COPIED
From: isaiah
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Bonnie Frownfelter
Cc: Governor Rick Snyder; Senator John Proos; State Rep Adam Zemke; State Rep Al Pscholka; State Rep Alberta Tinsley - Talabi; State Rep Amanda Price; State Rep
Andrea LaFontaine; State Rep Andrew Kandrevas; State Rep Andy Schor; State Rep Anthony Forlini; State Rep Aric Nesbitt; State Rep Ben Glardon; State Rep Bill
Lavoy; State Rep Bill Rogers; State Rep Bob Genetski; State Rep Brad Jacobsen; State Rep Brandon Dillon; State Rep Brian Banks; State Rep Bruce Rendon; State Rep
Charles Brunner; State Rep Charles Smiley; State Rep Cindy Denby; State Rep Collene Lamonte; State Rep Dale Zorn; State Rep Dan Lauwers; State Rep Dave Pagel;
State Rep David Knezek; State Rep David Nathan; State Rep David Rutledge; State Rep Dian Slavens; State Rep Douglas Geiss; State Rep Earl Poleski; State Rep Ed
McBroom; State Rep Eileen Kowall; State Rep Ellen Lipton; State Rep Frank Foster; State Rep Fred Durhal; State Rep Gail Haines; State Rep George Darany; State Rep
Greg MacMaster; State Rep Gretchen Driskell; State Rep Harold Haugh; State Rep Harvey Santana; State Rep Henry Yanez; State Rep Hugh Crawford; State Rep Jase
Bolger; State Rep Jeff Farrington; State Rep Jeff Irwin; State Rep Jim Ananich; State Rep Jim Stamas; State Rep Jim Townsend; State Rep Joel Johnson; State Rep
John Kivela; State Rep John Olumba; State Rep John Walsh; State Rep Jon Bumstead; State Rep Jon Switalski; State Rep Joseph Graves; State Rep Joseph Haveman;
State Rep Kate Segal; State Rep Ken Goike; State Rep Ken Yonker; State Rep Kenneth Kurtz; State Rep Kevin; State Rep Kevin Daley; State Rep Klint Kesto; State Rep
Kurt Heise; State Rep Lisa Lyons; State Rep Marcia Hover Wright; State Rep Margaret O'Brien; State Rep Marilyn Lane; State Rep Martin Howrylak; State Rep Matt
Lori; State Rep Mike Callton; State Rep Mike McCready; State Rep Mike Shirkey; State Rep Nancy Jenkins
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT
Dear Michigan elected official,
adopt the below document as soon as possible
Thank you
Charlie Forster
Jones MI
49061
[My note: Please copy and paste the above ACT and present it to your townships and counties councils/commissioners to create an Ordinance to adopt this Act for the
protection of the peoples rights, then give notice to the county sheriff so he is informed and can enforce the ordinance. This is being sent to all the above by USPS.<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MICHIGAN SEAT BELT LAW -TICKET
----- Original Message -----
From: Donald F
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:41 AM
Subject: Seat belt ticket
Well it happened. The ticket that I said if I ever got, I would be really angry. This is the most Un-Constitutional nonsense ever!
Imagine a cop having nothing better to do than peak through your vehicle windows and see if you have your seat belt on! Tell me WE are not just a resource to milk for
money?! This fits under the "unreasonable search and seizure" category doesn't it? A cop can say, "It didn't look like you had your seat belt on, so what else is going on
today?" That's bull crap!!! We are not free, why do we keep deluding ourselves?
So, I'm driving through the little town of Mancelona like I do 3 times a week for the last 10 years. Barney Fife is sitting at a gas station facing the highway, waves to a
"buddy" heading north, turns to look my way as I was passing at just the perfect time, I was heading south, and whips out behind me. You know that feeling you get
when you know for sure it's you they are coming for. Another guy was right on my tail with a full size pick-up so the LEO couldn't see me right away from the time he
pulled out, so I had pulled my belt on knowing that was the only reason he could pull me over. I thought, "there ya go ya pot licker, got it on now". He lights em up, I
pull over and he says, "I'm enforcing the seat belt law today and you have to have it on before I see you didn't, license and registration" or something like that. I told
him "I have a CPL", he says "OK". I give him "my papers" he heads back to "generate some revenue" with his pen.
When he comes back to my window I thought I'd share my feelings with him, I said, "When you became a "Peace Officer" (look up the difference between that and a
LEO if you don't know) did you ever think you would be nothing more than a revenue generator?" His eyes bugged out and he got real nervous, he realized he wasn't
talking to a sheep. He said, "Our department only gets $3 per seat belt fine" I said, "I don't care, do you know there are real criminals around here, Meth Labs, drug
dealers, and here you are wasting your time with me, a tax paying, law abiding Citizen, why don't you go and catch some real bad guys!?" Somewhere in my ranting I
told him that I "wear my seat belt religiously and I would see him in court" because I had it on, I figured it's his word against mine. He wanted to tell me a story about
safety and try to be my "buddy" and I said, "Just give me the ticket, I don't need to listen to your preaching". Then he got that shocked look again and with shaking
hands pointed at the ticket to explain what I needed to do, about calling this number and marking the boxes, you know.
I felt pretty good about enlightening him about "bull crap laws" and how one Citizen anyway, ain't gonna take it. Now I have to go and fight this crap in court, anyone
have any experience at this and want to give me some advice?
If WE as a people don't get mad as hell and fight this crap WE are going to be corralled into a pen and charged with "chewing gum in bondage"!
If you still don't "get it", as I have a diverse audience here and you think "what's the big deal Don, pay the ticket and move on". Please tell me that, so I can remove you
from my mailing list, there really is no hope for you and you really should just go get your "chip" now and save the Powers that Be alot of hassle.
Just thought you might like to enjoy a story that happened "close to home". Taking any advice offered. Your friend, Don
]My note: If anyone has any suggestions for Don to assist him in court please contact me and I will get you in touch with him. Let's help one another folks to restore
our de jure republic of, by, and for the people. The POLICE STATE, called Michigan needs to be dismantled. <><]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bulletin Board -NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS -PUBLICATION IN FREE PRESS
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
• NOTICE
NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this notice to all branches
of Congress and local government that have sworn an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution.
This notice is to let all members of congress and local government know you are very close, if not already, in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your
employment by the people of Michigan. It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional
decree. HLS does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.Entire notice at:www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/notice.html
From Detroit Free Press & The Detroit News on 2013-02-24
http://www.michigan.com/classifieds/#420/70 [Runs for seven days in print and online
February 21, 2013 NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE DEFACTO MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this NOTICE to all branches of Congress and local government that have sworn
an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution. This notice is to let all members of
congress and local government know you are very close, if not already in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your employment by the
people of Michigan.
It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional decree. Homeland Security
(HLS) does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone. Read complete NOTICE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - WHAT CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN IS DOING - A model for others to implement
Original message
From: isaiah
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:39 AM
To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
Cc: xxxxx xxxxxx
Subject: LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
xxxxxx,
FYI this is the one from Indiana
Make ours very similar!
IF the Fed wants to cut grants or sharing funds we can cut out all their income!!
xxxxx
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/franklin-county-indiana-passes-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance/
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/franklin-county-commissioners-sign-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance-into-law
Here is the language of the ordinance:
LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the right to keep and bear
arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN
COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The Franklin County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well
regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders,
rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
A. The Franklin County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as given by the
Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county, are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be
considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws, orders, rules, or
regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act takes effect upon approval by the
Franklin County Board of Commissioners
------------------------copy and paste the following to an email and send to county council members or commissioners in your township or county ------------
~submitted by Gray Beard
[My note: this is what everyone in Michigan should start working on in their townships and counties, (change county to township in above form, and commissioners
to the terminology used in your area if different). People really need to start showing up to the council (commissioners) meetings in their township and counties. As
you meet people at these meetings form jural assemblies of the people to transition the “corporate commissioners” into a de jure republic voice of, by, and for the
people instead of the machine it now is to further the corporate/socialist/communist/democratic/progressive/collectivist control agenda.<><]
February 20, 2013 RESOLUTION VS. ORDINANCE - Gilberton, PA WHY CAN'T WE DO THIS IN MICHIGAN?
From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: resolution VS Ordinance
The paper was calling it a Resolution but the actual wording is Ordnance. The thing to remember is that a resolution has no force of law. The ordnance will give the
twp the opportunity to instruct the county sheriff to remove the Feds. See if you can get an ordnance adopted in your area. Mine is looking at it
Isaiah
-----------------------------------------------------
Resolution vs. Ordinance
Gilberton, PA is a small borough in Schuylkill County, with a population of about 840, but the little community took a big stand Thursday night. “It`s about time that
the little guy stands up to the government and says we don`t want any change. This is the purpose of this. We want to continue to have our Second Amendment rights,
the right to bear arms and the right to choose,” said Mayor Mary Lou Hannon of Gilberton.
Borough council members unanimously passed a resolution in support of the Second Amendment at a packed council meeting. The resolution is also in opposition to
any local, state or federal regulations of firearms.
The resolution was the borough police chief’s idea and supported by dozens of folks who packed into the council meeting room, who applauded when council
members approved it. READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 19, 2013 MCMILLIN BILL SEEKS TO AVERT FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF SCHOOL CURRICULUM -District 45, Rochester Hills
State Rep. Tom McMillin today introduced legislation that prevents the federal government from imposing federal standards, curriculum and testing on local schools, all
of which constitute unfunded - and mostly undefined - mandates.
House Bill 4276 removes the state from participation in the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which McMillin said is a federal attempt to take decision-making
abilities from state and local school officials.
"We are expected to blindly accept these standards from the federal government, which thinks it knows what Michigan schoolchildren need in terms of curriculum
better than we do," said McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. "This is an obvious overreach by the federal government into our classrooms and we should join the other states
that have opted out of the initiative. The federal government should not dictate what is taught in every classroom in the nation, especially in Michigan." READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C
[My thought: This is a good start for Michigan to start enacting the Tenth Amendment, but it needs to be enacted across the board for all unconstitutional over-
stepping powers by the Federal Corporation government and not just the ones that step on certain toes. The local communities should take back the control of their
schools and curriculum from the state. <><]
February 18, 2013 READ THE 1963 CONSTITUTION - WHICH ISN'T A CONSTITUTION AT ALL- BUT A CORPORATE CONTRACT
I suggest everyone take a look at the operating Constitution of Michigan, which is the 1963 Version, the later rulings are included with reference at the bottom of each
section. Two points of interest, first the watered down generic oath of office, Article XI reads:
They will "support", what happened to protect, defend, or uphold the Constitution? Absolutely no accountability with such an ambiguous word as "support." but given
the fact that this is clearly a Corporate Contract and not a Constitution of, by, and for the people of Michigan it really is not surprising. Second point of interest is
found in Article IX:
there How many people in Michigan have even read this Corporate Contract, or recognize it as such.
No wonder Michigan was picked to become a "pilot police state", and perhaps that is the very reason the first implementation of fluoride into drinking water was
introduced in Grand Rapids first, before it went throughout the state and on to other states. Now Michigan is a "Constitution Free Zone" by decree from Homeland
Security, and what legislation has been put in place by our Michigan Congress to "support" the Constitutional Fourth Amendment, since they have the "support" of the
Tenth Amendment to do so. They are paid to represent the people of Michigan and to "SUPPORT" the Constitution, so it is their duty to create Legislation to "Support"
the Constitutional Rights of the people, that is their job. We should not have to lobby for such protection, not when it comes to the Bill of Rights. The people of
Michigan are already so oppressed due to the POLICE STATE statues, codes and laws, not to mention the over-regulating of everything for so long that the duty of the
Michigan Congress should be to spend time nullifying these repugnant laws for the people, as the representatives of the people.
The Tenth Amendment is all the authority Congress needs to nullify repugnant unconstitutional laws coming out of DC, and if they are not going to do this when it is
THEIR JOB and DUTY to do so, then perhaps a RECALL is in order.
I suggest the people read the three constitution below and contrast the difference, the first is the operating 1963 used by the defacto corporate congress of Michigan,
the second is the original 1835 Constitution, and the third is the 1835 Revised, Ratified Constitution for the De Jure Republic for Michigan.
1963 Constitution operating today by defacto Michigan Congress
1835 First Constitution for Michigan, obtaining statehood
1835 Original Constitution Revised and Ratified for the De Jure Republic for Michigan (Of course it is only provisional)
Citizen Guide to Defacto State Government - This is the current guide for the citizens of Michigan from the defacto Michigan Congress
When I put together the NOTICE to the members of Congress in Michigan, which I'm working on now, it needs to be sent out by you and others in your area as well,
and this can be by email. I will be sending the notice to all members via email and USPS mail, as well as a portion will be published but for the sake of expense readers
will than be directed to a web page set-up for it for more information. This is a group effort that all the people need to let their representatives know what is expected
from them as "paid" representatives for the people. I will send out information and try to make it as easy as possible to take action. The only way we are going to be
able to transition our de jure republic of, by, and for the people back into existence to protect our "Immunities" from an over-stepping tyrannical defacto Federal
Government, and as it would appear, the defacto state level as well is to implement them at our township level by building jural assemblies of the people, and expand
out from there. That is where, we the people have the greatest power.<><
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FACT SHEET ON U.S. "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE"
Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the
US land and coastal borders. The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This "
Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas. (Are You Living In A Constitution Free Zone? See the interactive map >>)
We urge you to call on Congress to hold hearings on and pass legislation to end these egregious violations of Americans' civil rights. FACT SHEET
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Federal Reserve audit exposes major securities fraud and the embezzlement of $16 trillion
An audit of the Federal Reserve has revealed that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly doled out more than $16 trillion in zero interest loans to some of the
largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world. The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the
Fed acted illegally. In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to its employees and private contractors so they could keep
investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans. The report is evidence that reveals major securities fraud in the
embezzlement of $16 trillion by the Federal Reserve.
$16 trillion is 10 times more than what the U.S. Congress authorized and Bush ($700 billion) and Obama ( $787 billion) signed off on. The Federal Reserve was only
authorized by Congress to use $1.487 trillion in federal tax dollars in bailouts. The Federal Reserve embezzled another $14.5 trillion.
The Congressional report determined that the Fed secretly hide most of the embezzled money into their own banks. The rest the Fed unilaterally transferred trillions of
dollars to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland. Foreign banks and corporations which the Federal Reserve bankers had a personal financial
interest or stake in. ARTICLE
February 17, 2013 IS THERE ANYONE HAVING TROUBLES WITH YOUR HOMEOWNERS, OR COUNTRY ESTATE INSURANCE?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You Can't Ban Evil
This young lady hits the nail on the head, telling a side of the gun control issue that unfortunately most have either never thought about or pretend to be ignorant as to
the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment! (You know for a fact that the self-serving politicians in Washington know the intent and purpose of the 2nd Amendment
but want to exercise their power and control over us and are afraid their corrupt regime might be overthrown some day!) Take a couple minutes to listen to what a very
bright young black woman has learned...LISTEN
February 15, 2013 Oath Keepers » Stewart Rhodes Speaks at Albany New York Gun Rights Rally on February 12
Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes gave a fiery speech to approximately 3,000 New York gun owners, urging them to refuse to comply to the “SAFE Act,” to
refuse to disarm, to nullify at every level. He also urged them to make sure their county was a “Molon Labe” county, asking them “is your county a ‘come and take it’
county, or is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!” He told them to make sure all the gun owners and veterans in their county are ready to
stand up, and will commit to refuse to comply, and then go to the sheriff and the police chief of their town and put them on notice that they are expected to choose
sides. He told the crowd to use April 19, 2013, the upcoming anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord, in 1775, as the deadline for their sheriff, police chiefs
[and all other oath sworn public servants] to choose sides — “are they patriots, or are they redcoats?” at the rally Oath Keepers had the effigies of Cuomo, Schumer,
Bloomberg, and other oath breaking traitors dressed up in red coats, with signs hanging around their necks saying “Oath Breaker,” “Red Coat” and “Traitor”
Then retired New York State Police (Highway Patrol) officer John Wallace, a member of Oath Keepers, led thousands of New Yorkers in an oath renewal/oath taking
ceremony, pledging to defend the Constitution and to not disarm WATCH
[My thought: It is my hope there can be peaceful resolution, that all the newly sworn oath keepers will take this oath back to their communities to help more people to
STAND UP and claim what is already ours,and always has been, but to do so with a calm, firm RESOLVE using their VOICE to kick the progressives out of their
communities and reinstate new laws of, by, and for the people in accordance with the Constitution - Bill of Rights, standing on first our God given Rights, next our
Declaration of Independence given to us by our very wise forefathers. We do NOT ACQUIESCE, and all we have to do is TELL THEM<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ONE EASY LESSON
----- Forwarded Message ----
Sent: Thu, February 14, 2013 11:20:09 AM
Subject: One Easy Lesson
Greetings and Salutations on this Happy Valentine's Day,
We all have busy/full lives. If you have not taken the time to become familiar with UN Agenda 21/Sustainability/Place Making/Smart Growth/Walking Community, etc.,
you Need to do so. Go to the site at the very bottom.
I have previously sent out info regarding this topic, made two presentations to my local Boyne City Commissioners, and more. I just came upon this site and found it
concise as well as an excellent source for additional related info. There is so much information out there, but requires some digging/time.
The common rebuttal by those that are knowingly or unknowingly involved is that it is partisan, we just use the same terms, fear mongering by the Tea Party, a
conspiracy theory, the UN has no control over us, etc.
Many who are strongly into conservation and the environment are finding they have been infiltrated and being used by this agenda. Many groups and ideas initially had
good intentions which were introduced and talked about with very nice community friendly verbiage, but are really being manipulated by ICLEI and others often
through acquiring grants only after becoming a member. Grant writing, if you have not noticed, has become a new art form.
Follow the money, as some of it comes from our tax dollars through the EPA and other agencies in our government. Did they need Congressional Approval? Other
money comes from foundations like the Kellogg Foundation, Tides Foundation, and other huge money pots. Just research the sources of their funding.
This is very organized, tenacious, well funded and wears Many Masks. Behind the Green Mask is a book written by Rosa Koire whose web site www.
democratsagainstunagenda21.com is found on the site at the bottom.
Our potus plans much more for his (O for A)
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Organizing_for_America. You heard or heard about his plans for the future on many topics in his S of the U. One is the
Environment (made into the new religion). He plans on changes even if Congress does not comply.....yet more Exec. Orders. People will be entering our communities
or people already there using the avenues already in place to start small and grow. Just like the population, where do you begin to indoctrinate, with the easiest and the
youngest of us, our children. Make sure you know what your children/grandchildren are learning in school, reading, and watching on TV (now there is another
interesting topic). So this idea has and is going to get stronger, so be very aware of what is going on in your communities, counties, state regions, states, etc. When
you can and need to...Speak Up. Being Forewarned is Forearmed Nothing worse than being Blindsided. This is only one of many issues. Scary!
• one easy lesson - What Is Agenda 21
whatisagenda21.net/agenda21.htm
All part of Agenda 21 policy. Economic Prosperity? Public Private Partnerships (PPP). ... ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, ...
Be Well, God Bless You and Yours, and God Bless America Carole
Carpe Diem,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ACQUIESCE
How is the DEFACTO US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT able to do all they do? Because by our SILENCE, we ACQUIESCE. It is time to speak up, and let them
KNOW we do NOT ACQUIESCE peaceably, but with firm RESOLVE.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMPORTANT FOR PERIMETER STATES (MICHIGAN IS ONE) [CONSTITUTION FREE ZONES - MAP]
DHS Nullifies Fourth Amendment Rights of Millions of Americans
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution reads:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The Department of Homeland Security doesn’t believe in the Fourth Amendment and has recently issued statements to that affect. They are claiming that if you live
within 100 miles of the international border that they have the right to search all electronic devices, including cell phones and laptop and tablet computers without
probable cause or first securing a warrant. The 100 mile distance is being referred to as the border security search zones.
This would include cities such as San Diego, Escondido, El Centro, Yuma, Tucson, Las Cruces, Carlsbad, El Paso, Brownsville, Seattle, Grand Forks, Toledo,
Cleveland, Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Montpelier to name just a few.
But wait, it gets even better! If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey or Rhode
Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state. Let’s not leave New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia out of the fun, because large areas of these states
are also being designated as search zones.
If you live anywhere in any of the designated search zones, the feds claim to have the right to invade your privacy and conduct an unconstitutional search of your
private possessions without any probable cause or warrant. If you ask me, this sounds a lot like the Gestapo under Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany, which is what I
compared the Department of Homeland Security to in an earlier article. This just helps to reinforce my claims. Read more:
~submitted by Cathy C
February 14, 2013 Dr. Edwin Vieira on The Militia - NewsWithViews.TV
Published on Feb 7, 2013
While most of the recent gun-control debate is focused on the individual right to bear arms could it be that we are focusing on the wrong battle? Constitutional expert
Dr. Edwin Vieira joins us to explain that not only is the "Militia" not a four-letter word, but that our Founders determined that it was "necessary for the security of a free
state." Allow Dr. Vieira to explain to you why the need for a "well-regulated militia" is the backbone to the right to keep and bear arms. You will never again look at this
issue in the same way. LISTEN
[My note: This is the most informative information yet concerning our Second Amendment Right, please take the time to listen]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UNALIENABLE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Need your ACTION
Circulate this to as many people as you can to sign and send out ASAP
"They deserve a vote,” Obama said last night in his SOTU speech. They being the gun control activists.
Well, us anti gun control activists also deserve a vote…well congressmen Stockman, and Broun have answer the call to KILL ALL GUN CONTROL in the House.
Click on this link to contact your congressman telling them to support corgessmen Stockman, and Broun.
capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=62408466&PROCESS=Take+Action see if you can blast this out…..it’s going viral on FB already………..
Lots of people are talking about stuff to do, but not many are taking action…now is the time for action….
[We also deserved a vote, Mr. Obama, but we didn't get it from Harry Reid!]
~submitted by Cathy C
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ALL WARS ARE BANKERS
I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto
nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample
precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using
printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which
the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-
bearing bank notes. READ MORE LISTEN VIDEO
~submitted by Bulldog75
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WHEN TO SHOOT A COP [Please watch the video before making a snap judgement based on this title]
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx xxxxxxxx
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:44 PM
Subject: When to shoot a cop?
I'm not advocating that, but be honest, if there is never a situation where that may be needed, you might as well prepare to get on the "cattle cars" now!
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CjDHQ16MyKY
[My thought: This was sent to me by someone and they will remain anonymous due to the fear this title invokes in many. Is there a time to shoot a cop, lets rephrase
it with "Is there a time to defend oneself from the criminal intent of another?" The title is suggestive and provokes fear in many people, and the reason for this
is that people are programmed to read, "one liners" from email and text messages that they no longer read the essence of what is truly being said. Before you along
with many others make a quick judgement based solely on the title, please listen to the video and what it is saying. This person is exercising his First Amendment
Right. He is not advocating anything nor suggesting anything other then truth. People have a RIGHT to defend themselves, whether it is with a fist, knife, gun, or ball
bat, and it doesn't matter if it is against a home invader that is a drug dealer, plumber, or that's right police officer that is corrupt and stepping outside his oath of office
and breaking the very laws taken to defend the people, but now is using that position to harm their life, or that of their families. We...as a people need to bring back
truth, honor, and justice to our nation, and especially our state (Tenth Amendment). If we expect to be free we must accept the responsibility of "self-governance" that
comes with that freedom, and part of that responsibility is holding ALL criminals accountable, no matter their office or position. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT
EVEN THOSE THAT ARE IN PLACE TO UPHOLD THE LAW, AND THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEFEND THEIR LIFE AND LIBERTY AGAINST ALL
THAT WOULD TRY TO TAKE IT. In closing I will make this statement, "violence begans violence so it should never be the first choice for resolution, but defending
one's life, family, or neighbor from unjust lethal force is not violence defined by criminal intent, it is Self-Defense, and that is the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of a
FREE PEOPLE <><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE REAL STATE OF THE UNION FOR FEBRUARY 12
Critical condition....
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” George H. W. Bush,
addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. February 1, 1992.....he said WHAT??? READ MORE
~submitted by Judd
February 13, 2013 RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY CONSTITUTION - NOT PROVIDED BY CONSTITUTION!
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rights are protected by Constitution - not provided by Constitution!
There is an un-known number of Americans that support the truths told in this man's letter below. That un-known number is not small by any means. This subject is
being pushed to a head by our government for reasons other than the latest school shooting. The government is merely taking advantage of that tragedy to move
forward with plans they already had in place. As I continue to receive thousands upon thousands of similar pieces to the one I am forwarding below, I know that our
country is headed for real problems as written below. These Americans are not afraid to defend their rights and our current government seems hell-bent on proceeding
with an unconstitutional plan to remove their/our rights, so what do you think will ultimately happen here? Which side of this stand-off will you end up on? Think
about where this problem has come form originally! Did guns get us into this Government against the people situation? Did guns cause our elected leaders to stop
doing their jobs of protecting our nation and us?
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Guns Across America Rally - Michigan Jan 19th 2013
GAA Rally January 19th 2013 State Capitol Building, Lansing Michigan. Freedom lovers and defenders of our Constitution turned out to stand and be counted in a
peaceful and civil demonstration in support of the 2nd Amendment. You're looking at the safest place to be in Michigan on this particular afternoon... Among
responsible and law abiding gun owners! There are three parts , this is number two VIDEO
Anti-Gun Rally Held in Southfield VIDEO
Listen carefully to the last gentleman speaking and what he has to say, very important message. This was recorded by Fox News
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE CREATOR'S "REMEDY"
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: The Creator's "remedy"
Excerpt:
February 11, 2013 ATTENTION - Constitutional Sheriff's Leadership Call
Anyone interested in learning how Constitutional Sheriff's Association will be attempting to unite the people in the nearly 3,100 counties in local groups. We will be
establishing websites for each county where the people will be able to educate themselves and discuss critical local issues. To restore America we need to begin by
restoring our counties. Please listen to the call live by calling (347)884-9499 or click on the following link and listen to the archived show at your convenience.
The show is schedule for Tuesday, February 11, 2013 at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
Leadership Call for the Constitutional Sheriff's Association
~submitted by WRAM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
GUN CONTROL AND THE CONSTITUTION
Norm:
Please share this article from the Wall Street Journal on the Constitutionality of Gun control.
Thanks much!
Kent
Bellaire
Gun Control and the Constitution
The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First..
By DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. And ANDREW M. GROSSMAN
Could there be a better illustration of the cultural divide over firearms than the White House photograph of our skeet-shooting president? Clay pigeons are launched into
the air, but the president's smoking shotgun is level with the ground. This is not a man who is comfortable around guns. And that goes a long way toward explaining
his gun-control agenda.
Lack of informed presidential leadership aside, there is a gulf between those Americans who view guns as invaluable tools for self-defense, both against private
wrongdoers and a potentially tyrannical government, and those who regard that concept as hopelessly archaic and even subversive. For them, hunting is the only
possible legitimate use of firearms, and gun ownership should be restricted to weapons suited to that purpose.
But while the level of the policy discourse leaves much to be desired, its constitutional dimensions are even more dimly recognized, much less seriously engaged. Yet
the debate over guns, as is the case with many other contentious issues in American history, cannot be intelligently pursued without recognizing its constitutional
dimensions. The Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Heller v. District of Columbia confirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says: "the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
After Heller and its follow-on case, McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the Second Amendment rights to the states, what government cannot do is deny the individual
interest in self-defense. As a legal matter, that debate is settled.
The president and his allies seem to have missed the message, as demonstrated by his continued insistence that most of the American people, including many hunters,
support his proposed gun-control measures. Even if that claim were true, constitutionally protected rights are guarded with particular vigor precisely when public
opinion turns against them. Meanwhile, the president's continued appeals to emotion, capitalizing on a series of tragic mass shootings, also ill-fit what ought to be a
serious and dispassionate discussion.
While the courts are still sorting out Heller's implications, politicians should not assume that they have a free hand to restrict private gun ownership. Decades of case
law interpreting and applying the other provisions of the Bill of Rights show that there are hard-and-fast limits on gun control.
The general framework is straightforward and certainly well-known to those who have studied (let alone taught) constitutional law. The government cannot abridge
constitutionally protected rights simply to make a symbolic point or because it feels that something must be done. Any measure must be justified by a legitimate
government interest that is compelling or at least important. At the same time, any regulation must be "narrowly tailored" to achieve that interest.
On that basis, in a recent case the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on depictions of animal cruelty, rejecting the government's argument that it had any
legitimate interest in banning pictures and videos associated with crimes, and finding—even assuming the government's interest—that the statute swept up too much
protected speech. In this way, judicial balancing requires a careful weighing of the government's interests against the individual's, with a thumb on the scale in favor of
the individual.
But you wouldn't know that from the current gun-control debate. Several states, for example, are considering gun-insurance mandates modeled after those for
automobile insurance. There is no conceivable public-safety benefit: Insurance policies cover accidents, not intentional crimes, and criminals with illegal guns will just
evade the requirement. The real purpose is to make guns less affordable for law-abiding citizens and thereby reduce private gun ownership. Identical constitutionally
suspect logic explains proposals to tax the sale of bullets at excessive rates.
The courts, however, are no more likely to allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than to undermine the First. A state cannot circumvent the right to
a free press by requiring that an unfriendly newspaper carry millions in libel insurance or pay a thousand-dollar tax on barrels of ink—the real motive, in either case,
would be transparent and the regulation struck down. How could the result be any different for the right to keep and bear arms?
The same constitutional infirmity plagues the president's plan. Consider his proposal for a new "assault weapons" ban, targeting a class of weapons distinguished by
their cosmetic features, such as a pistol grip or threaded barrel. These guns may look sinister, but they don't differ from other common weapons in any relevant
respect—firing mechanism, ammunition, magazine size—and so present no greater threat to public safety. Needless to say, the government has no legitimate interest in
banning guns that gun-controllers simply do not like and would not, themselves, care to own.
Also constitutionally suspect are restrictions on magazine size. There is no question that a limit of 10 rounds (as the president has proposed) or seven (as enacted by
New York state last month) would impair the right to self-defense. A magazine with 10 rounds may provide adequate protection against a single nighttime intruder. But
it may not: What if there are two intruders?
Further compounding the constitutional problem is the fact that the benefit of such limits is questionable. For a practiced and calm shooter, swapping magazines takes
no more than a couple of seconds. And a swap may not even be necessary if the shooter has multiple guns, as in several mass shootings in recent years.
While some limit on magazines may be constitutionally permissible, one that falls below the capabilities of guns in common usage for self-defense is probably not. The
most popular guns for self-defense take 15 or so rounds in their default configurations. Given the uncertain benefit of restricting magazine size, not to mention the tens
of millions of "high capacity" magazines in circulation, something near that number may be a constitutional minimum.
And while there is no question that procedural requirements like background checks are permissible, that does not mean that the government may place an undue
burden on the right of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Excessive waiting periods, registration fees and the like are all subject to scrutiny, lest they infringe on
constitutionally guaranteed rights.
At bottom, the Constitution requires sensible and effective regulation of guns that respects and upholds this most fundamental right. Policies motivated by nothing more
than discomfort with firearms, often born of a lack of experience, fall far short.
Messrs. Rivkin and Grossman practice law in the Washington, D.C., office of Baker Hostetler. Mr. Rivkin served in the Justice Department and the White House
Counsel's Office in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 09, 2013 Dr. Benjamin Carson's Amazing Speech at the National Prayer Breakfast with Obama Present
Dr. Carson addresses some of the issues facing America today by using sound reasoning and common sense solution, very refreshing... WATCH HERE
February 08, 2013 Carl Miller - The Constitution And The Bill Of Rights
[My note: I looked for Carl Miller on youtube and of course found him, he's here in Michigan! He shares a lot of information in simple language. VIDEO 1 2 3 ]
February 07, 2013 REQUEST TO GOVERNOR SNYDER ON GUN CONTROL
From: xxxx@my.dialzip.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Rick.Snyder@michigan.gov
Subject: Gun control
Governor Snyder,
This is a request to sign a bill into law a bill prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws or Regulations that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the
Organic Constitution of the United States.
ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable in the Township and
County described.
There is No delegation of power to any member of government to infringe on the Second Amendment!! Thus the term Shall Not Be Infringed!
Note ,The term in the Second Amendment “A Well Regulated Militia.”
Well Regulated has nothing whats so ever to do with any type of government control!
The term means that you are proficient in the use of your arms !
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site
( http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html) along with a lot of other good information.
Home page http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us
Some food for thought in some other Nations like Switzerland where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon's and ammunition in every home and are
required to attend regular training crime is near non existent.
Grey Beard
[My note: It would be great if everyone would email, send a letter, or call with this request to protect the people from the over-stepping power of the Federal
Government, reference the Tenth Amendment and also scroll down to UNODA Article, then go to the Militia page and scroll to read the DICK ACT.
From the Tenth Amendment Center:
The Bill of Rights is under attack, not just the Second Amendment but all of them in some form or another. They all must stand or none can stand and the over-
reaching power of the Federal Corporate Government is chipping away at them, we need to stop this chipping by NOT COMPROMISING ON ANY OF OUR RIGHTS]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TEXAS DECIDES TO REIN IN, "LIBERAL" CURRICULUM
Texas lawmakers have decided they want to rein in a controversial public school curriculum content and management system that at one point taught “Allah is God."
Most of the state’s classrooms, some 80 percent, are using the CSCOPE program that also has raised eyebrows because educators had refused to allow parents and
others to see what being taught.
Twenty-five state representatives now have signed onto a proposed oversight statute that would target CSCOPE, the online system that set up firewalls and passwords
so that parents would not be able to see the curriculum.
Bill author State Rep. Steve Toth said, “It’s imperative that we bring CSCOPE under the direction and oversight of the locally elected members of the State Board of
Education. Repeated instances of impropriety along with a decidedly liberal leaning agenda makes this move of the utmost importance. ISDs all over the State of Texas
have been misled as to what CSCOPE is and what it contains. We’ve got to get this right.” READ MORE
[My thought: This could be very good for the rest of the country because most of our nations curriculum begins in Texas, but we need parents attending the school
board meetings and find out what their children are "really" being taught. It is our responsibility as parents, NOT the "village" or the UN to decide for us. We must
become actively involved in our children's education, and it has been that inactively that is one of the variables in so many of our children graduating without the ability
to read or comprehend what is being read. Michigan can do this too but we need parents that will stand up and say, "enough". When our schools started programming
propaganda in the 70's by moving away from proper education, that is when many parents decided to home-school their children. It was good for their children and
their education, but unfortunately it did nothing to undo what was taking place in our schools and now we see the results of that shift away from true education to
social programming.<><]
February 06, 2013 [More action being taken by the people] 121101-Citizens Grand Jury Indictment
----- Original Message -----
From: @yahoo.com
To: xxxxx xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Federal Court Indicts [attachment linked above]
This transgression makes Watergate look like something from the sandbox.
This is only the tip of the berg.
xxxx
"If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."
Joe Bannister
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS
Small Arms
Insurgents, armed gang members, pirates, terrorists - they can all multiply their force through the use of unlawfully acquired firepower. The illicit circulation of small
arms, light weapons and their ammunition destabilizes communities, and impacts security and development in all regions of the world.
A worldwide scourge
The illicit trade in small arms, light weapons and ammunition wreaks havoc everywhere. Mobs terrorizing a neighbourhood. Rebels attacking civilians or peacekeepers.
Drug lords randomly killing law enforcers or anyone else interfering with their illegal businesses. Bandits hijacking humanitarian aid convoys. In all continents,
uncontrolled small arms form a persisting problem. READ FOR YOURSELF HERE
COMMON SENSE IMPLEMENTED: First, where does the United Nations (UN) get the right to interfere with a Sovereign People (Americans) and our RIGHTS? By
their own words "ILLICIT TRADE" they are saying there is NO PROTECTION for the people, but yet they want to take the weapons that LAW ABIDING PEOPLE
would have for protection of self and their family. Carefully read the above two paragraphs which are directly from UNODA, link above. Now really think about this
for a moment and answer this question: Do you really think a ban on small arms will keep you safe from "ILLICIT GUN TRADE"? Do you think this illicit trade will
stop? Now think about "Fast and Furious", the US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT GAVE WEAPONS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL, really think about that for
a moment. Do you really want only the GOVERNMENT AND THE DRUG LORDS OR LAW BREAKERS TO HAVE GUNS?
There is going to be another vote in March on the UN Small Arms Gun Ban. Contrast this against Switzerland that has the lowest crime rate in the world, is it because
their guns are banned? No, it is just the opposite, every home has a rifle and/or a handgun, that is at least about 99% of them, contrast that with Chicago that has some
of the most stringent gun laws in the country and crime is very high, and look at what Australia has to say since their guns have been banned VIDEO
NO AMERICAN should be supporting this or any ban on weapons of any kind in our country, and if they do , they are NOT AMERICANS in the true sense of the
word, because it is not only our Bill of Rights, but it is also COMMON SENSE for our own protection. There are Americans that are US citizens only to conduct
commerce; then there are US citizens that are married to the system in ideology and perhaps even took an Oath to the UNITED NATIONS, and in their mind it
supersedes their Constitutional Oath to the people, such as politicians and provocateurs to do their bidding (Agent (Provocateur Law & Legal Definition ... Disrupt the
activities of radical political groups in the U.S)
We already have all the laws we need against criminals having guns, but yet they still have them, and they still will if they are banned. Has anyone heard of the 'Black
Market'! Look back at history, the first act that took place before complete tyranny of the people BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT was a banning of guns, the ability
to protect themselves. Contrary to what some people choose to believe this CAN happen in America and is.
If common sense doesn't speak to your heart, then let me share this information:
With this ruling the DEFACTO UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT would once again be ignoring the LAW if they attempt to enact the UNITED
NATIONS Small Arms Treaty that is in conflict with our Constitutional BILL OF RIGHTS that BIND THE OVER-STEPPING REACH OF THE GOVERNMENT
against the American people. Then follow the above case with the below information:
:
So, how do we combat such blatant corruption of our BILL OF RIGHTS by those that are suppose to be protecting them? Well, here is one way that people are taking
action. This was sent to me today:
This is what it takes people, we are the solution, and its right where we are, and we must, with RESOLVE demand our RIGHTS be protected, and. what good is the
UN Small Arms Ban if each local township, city and/or state has laws making it null and void? The same can be done for all the other atrocities that are being carried
out on the American people. We...the people, which is "of, by, and for the people" can get it done if we come together in our own communities to protect our own
RIGHTS. It is lawful, and our DUTY to do so, reference "The Declaration of Independence:
My final note is, I pray every American will ponder the information presented and each individual will search their heart for TRUTH and stand on that truth, because
that is what separated America from the rest of the world, not the US Government, but the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE and the RIGHTS given to us by OUR CREATOR.
This is why so many migrated to America, something that most all natural Americans do not understand, but soon will if this self-destructive course we're on is not
diverted.
A very wise person said, "The cork won't pop until pressure is applied at the bottom". Are we going to lawfully and peaceably "pop the cork" and "release our freedom
out of the hands of those that are attempting to take them, instead of honoring their oaths to protect them? <><
February 05, 2013 NULLIFICATION DENIERS: WHAT JAMES MADISON REALLY SAID By Publius Huldah
Article: Nullification Deniers: What James Madison Really Said posted on NewsWithViews.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EXTREME CAUTION BANKSTER ALERT!
----- Original Message -----
From: Teri H
To: Teri H
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:11 PM
Subject: EXTREME CAUTION, BANKSTER ALERT!
Today a friend called to say that when his wife went down to their bank, Nashville Bank in Tenn. to renew the equity line of credit on their home she came home and
told him to go up to the bank and sign the papers. His name has never been on the loan so he went to the bank to straighten everything out. When he got there and he
was given the papers his wife had signed he found that on the bottom of every page in BOLD type it said that:
BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN REGARD TO ANY AND ALL EVENTS AND OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY
ARISE FROM IT
Fortunately my friend is far to savvy to have fallen for that. He threw a fit and demanded the bank explain what they thought they were trying to pull. The loan officer
called the main branch and then said, well we could take that off of there....( DUH! )
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN ANY DOCUMENT WITH EVEN SIMILAR LANGUAGE TO THAT ON IT. By signing that agreement they would
have been waiving all their rights to due process under the law and our Constitution. If the smaller banks like Nashville Bank are attempting this kind of entrapment you
can bet the BIG BANKS LED THE WAY!
If you have inadvertently signed such a document in the last three days get your butt back down to the bank and exercise your three day right to rescission!
This is unconscionable and cannot be tolerated. If the fraudster banks can get you to renew your loans and or mortgages with language like that in the documents they
have carte blanche ability to STEAL EVERYTHING YOU HAVE and you have NO POWER TO STOP THEM AND NO RECOURSE AFTERWARD!
--
Teri
"A nation...cannot survive treason from within...the traitor ...wears the face of his victims,...and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He
rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared......." Cicero, 42 B.C.E.
February 04, 2013 Henson Ong at Gun Violence Prevention Public Hearing - Hartford, CT - VIDEO
Mr. Ong is a Legal Immigrant that CHOSE to become an American. Please watch/listen to the video (link above) and learn. He showed up to support his chosen
country and defend the RIGHTS he has as an American citizen. We...the people that are natural born to our rights haven't a clue why they are in place or exactly what
they mean and how important they are, but those that were born in other countries completely understand and are standing to defend them. It is time all people stand
together and set aside our differences to understand what TRUE FREEDOM looks like for everyone. The defacto corporate system created this division and continues
to do so to keep our focus off them and what they doing. It's not working for them anymore, people have had enough! Please WATCH
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
New York State Resistance
With no soundtrack - Complete 33 minute video is here - Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the Arms Bill
[This is how it is done folks, but we have to show up to the meetings in numbers. We have the power of the people. Also, a reference is made to "brown shirts" for
those that are younger and do not know what this reference is, since so much history has been removed from textbooks, he is referring to Hitler's Brown Shirt, NAZI
POLICE FORCE. WATCH VIDEO]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Former Michigan Supreme Court Justice Diane Hathaway pleads guilty to bank fraud READ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RONALD REAGAN SPEECH
Ronald Reagan's church put this together to commemorate the birthday of Ronald Reagan.
Boy, how far have WE slipped in just a few short years! VIDEO
~submitted by DF
[My thought: This is an excellent speech and every American should listen to it a few times, then go to the Video Resource (fifth down on page), and watch the video
of JFK's speech, contrast the two and what they are saying. Since President Reagan, our country's values have slide into the gutter, and corruption is at all levels for all
to see and no action is taken against it, except to make laws taking the rights from the virtuous people that do not need them. The people can restore value to our
nation by restoring Almighty God and giving His Commandments back to the people, and mainly our children. We...the people can do it by restoring our religious
values, and at the same time our de jure republic in our local communities. The people at the local levels need to kick out the UN agenda that is being implemented by
the defacto US Corporate government. We, the people need to stand shoulder to shoulder defending our RIGHTS, ALL OF OUR RIGHTS FOR ALL PEOPLE. We
must defend all the Rights and not just the ones that individually we are partial to. All our rights stand, or all our rights will most certainly fall, and they are for all
people, because if all are not free, nobody is truly free<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
To: xxxxx xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:03 AM
Subject: ... Too Great not to Share [this email had numerous pictures that could not be shared here due to space, and the message was to pray for our military because
of this below statement:]
[The senders comment:]
It is very apparent that the ACLU is more interested in pushing an atheistic agenda instead of being truly concerned
with our rights. Keep this prayer request moving through your email list.
~submitted by Steve
[My thought and reply: The ACLU would not be able to do this if the people in the military protested against it, until the people stop allowing this usurpation of their
rights it will continue. Ronald Reagan said this about our First Amendment:
The "people:" are key to everything, just as the defacto is attempting another gun grab they will continue to completely remove Almighty God as well, but they can only
do this if the people will NOT STAND AND DEFEND THEIR RIGHTS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEIR FAITH AND THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS IT!!.
We can pray for our military as most do, but ultimately it is only within their power to change it, and might I add they take an oath to uphold the Constitution, but yet
they are allowing their own FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to be taken, or someone else's of a different faith. It is those that are directly affected by these edicts that
need to stand up and say "NO", just as it was when parents allowed prayer to be taken out of our schools, now look at the mess they are in, they can't learn the Ten
Commandments but they can learn how to properly apply a condom, such disgrace to our country, and the education of our children.<><]
February 01, 2013 A Letter From The SPECIAL FORCES COMMUNITY Concerning The Second Amendment
Excerpt from the letter:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who is Our Sheriff Working For?
When a society allows its political leaders to pass unjust laws the people suffer. When only just laws are enforced, the people's lives, liberty and property are respected.
In a where just laws prevail the result is peace, prosperity and freedom.
In a society that embraces only just laws the court system promotes equal justice, but when unjust laws are passed and enforced injustice prevails and the Courts
destroy the justice they were created to provide..When unjust laws become commonplace the government becomes the usurper of power and begins to extend special
benefits and privileges to certain groups and individuals at the expense others.
Any law that violates the principles spelled out in the Constitution are unjust. The Sheriffs have been elected to protect our rights and were to be the guardians of our
liberty and the defender of our Constitution. It was stated years ago that it is sometimes necessary for a patriot to defend his country from his government. The
Constitution was written to control the government not to control the people.
A County Sheriff must decide whether he or she will honor their oath or be an administrative assistant to the President of the United States. The Sheriff can not serve
two masters. He must take his marching orders from the people or the President.. It is up to us to elect righteous men or women to serve as our County Sheriff.
As a resident of the county, we have a right to know if our Sheriff had their fingers crossed when they promised to uphold the Constitution. We need to contact every
single County Sheriff in the land and find out who they are working for.
~submitted by WRAM
n of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was wondering if you were going to join these Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country that have
stated such? One Un-Constitutional mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example. Specifically, "assault
rifles" which is a bogus label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would qualify as an "assault rifle" in operation. You and I know the
legislation will include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have seen them do in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a
statement to the Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful laws
against the Citizens of your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that elected duty. I also encourage you to belong to CSPOA www.
constitutionpreservation.org/constitution-preservation/cspoa-bill-rights-presentation Please write me back with your views on this matter as I would hate to be one of
many Citizens in other counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with violating their Sworn Oath of Office and kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank
you for your diligence on this matter.
Sincerely,
xxx xxxxx
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Nx5MJNINQ
www.newswithviews.com/Gilbertson/gil103.htm
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5390
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
-----------------------------
harvest the info.
CITIZENS RULE BOOK (A Juror's Handbook)
A Layman's Guide To Jury Nullification - Liberty Crier YOU HAVE POWER IN THE JURY BOX
Jury Nullification is something you're not told about but it is your RIGHT as jurors to implement. Of course the judges do not want you to know this because they get
paid huge money for judgments processed through their courts. It is your duty to JUDGE THE LAW AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE JUDGING THE DEFENDANT,
and perhaps judge the law first if it is a constitutional law that left a "victim" in its wake. The state can NOT be the victim!
You have power in the JURY BOX...one of the ways to over-turn tyranny is in the JURY BOX... do not avoid jury duty..accept it and bring true justice to the people...
do NOT listen to what the Judge INSTRUCTS you to do..just remember if there is ".no victim there is no crime" no matter what the facts say. That is the foundation
of our Constitution and Bill of Rights...Please watch this very informative video on a layman's guide to jury nullification:
http://libertycrier.com/u-s-constitution/a-laymans-guide-to-jury-nullification/
"The last stand against tyranny takes place in the jury box. The legislative branch may pass unconstitutional laws and the judiciary branch may uphold
them. However, the individual citizen can nullify any law via jury nullification. Learn your rights as a juror. Most likely, you will not be told about them in
the courtroom!"
This page is now Archived
March 06, 2013 LETTER TO THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN -Sent out by email
A Letter to the people of Michigan:
It has been brought to my attention by my Savior Jesus Christ, the one and only King of Kings, that it is time for me to return to my original direction of serving the
people as they learn to manage their own health. I completed my doctorate in naturopathy, my BS in natural health, a certificate program in Family Herbals and a
certificate program in RBTI and then found myself on this de jure republic path momentarily. The path of natural health/healing, and freedom/liberty are intertwined
because both come from our Creator. It is time for me to set one aside for a season to serve the people that presently have the greater need, which is quality of life
through natural health practices.
In parting I’d like to say, I don’t think many understand the significance of sending (email & USPS) the Notice to all of Michigan’s Defacto Congress along with
Publishing it in the Detroit Free Press. They've been given notice that the people of Michigan do NOT acquiesce to the decree by HLS that Michigan is now a
Constitution Free Zone. I did not get a response from any of them addressing this most serious issue. I received one reply from Benishek and it was in reference to
the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act. When I receive the Tear Sheet from the Free Press I will post it on the page with the NOTICE. Perhaps some day someone
with the wherewithal to do something will find it useful. I will be removing the names from the notice and preservation act pages, but the locations will stay, and the
news page will go into archive status after this letter is posted. The website will remain and maybe from time to time I will add something to the resource page if it
important information.
It is time for me to start building my Manage Health Naturally practice to serve the people in a greater capacity than what I’ve been able to by doing what I’ve been
doing. I’m not going anywhere and I am an American, so patriotism runs through my blood, however, first and foremost I am a child of God and it is to Him I serve,
because it is only my service to Him that makes it possible for me to serve others by Faith with Love anchored in Truth. It is time for the Gospel of Jesus Christ and
His healing powers to be shared with others because it is His Kingdom that will be coming to Earth and will overcome evil, not by our works but by His grace.
It has been a blessing to have known some of you, even meeting in person, and to have phone conversations with others. Do not let the troubles of this world get you
down, return to building relationships and speaking with people, your neighbors, family, friends, and co-workers face to face because by doing this our de jure republic
will spring forth naturally by virtue of the people, which is them voluntarily seeking truth because of the love and kindness shown them by each of us. People are
hurting and need our help in their present circumstances. Information from the Matrix has no value to them but to do the complete opposite of what you hope to
accomplish by sharing it with them. I’m still here, I’m just returning to my original path that parallels this one, and unfortunately there isn’t enough time nor energy for
both. I intend to supplement my natural health education by including the Royal Rife Frequency technology and this will require a great deal of my time.
I want to thank each of you for all you’ve done and the help you’ve given. I pray peace, love, and joy that passes all understanding will come upon you, and your
families, and where this is sickness health will be found in a renewing of the spirit. Amen.
In God Is Our Trust,
Bonnie Frownfelter
[My final note which wasn't included in the above letter but feel compelled to say this due to everything that flies around cyberspace: I did not make this decision as a
result of coercion, threat, or bribery. I wasn't visited by black helicopters because of
March 02, 2013 HLS CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE - Inquiry sent to Rep Mike Shirkey, Rep Matt Lori, and Sen. John Proos
----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: "State Rep Mike Shirkey" <MikeShirkey@house.mi.gov>; "Rep. Matt Lori (District 59)" <dist059@house.mi.gov>; "John Proos"
<senjproos@senate.michigan.gov>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: HLS Constitution free zone
REP Mike Shirkey,Rep Matt Lori and Senator John Proos What is your view on the HLS constitutional free zone? Are they stepping on states rights? Do you
think HLS has the right or any authority to strip Michigan of the constitution? Acts like this are what make both of our issues very important. Thank You For
Your Time.
Charlie Forster
Jones Michigan
COMMUNICATION WITH REP. MIKE SHIRKEY
----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65)
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- Hello this is the very reason you must include all legal arms! Most all of the common name gun makers are owned by one of George Soros's fence company's
and are or will be made in china. If you could get the property tax rate down to what it was in the 1930's and get rid of the Michigan income tax someone
might think about coming in. When I was a young man working we had no state income tax! The income tax was put on to pay for the bridge and the politicons
of the day said when the bridge was payed for the tax would come off or be repealed!! What is the hold up?
Maybe we should look up and see when the bridge was paid off and start charging you folks interest on the monies extorted since. Charlie
On 03/01/2013 01:48 PM, Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65) wrote:
Hello
We do not have details on gun manufacturers in MI. We have no major makers, but are hoping to attract larger manufacturers from other states that have
excessive gun control laws. Smaller mom and pop manufacturers that are here may also expand with a better environment; you never know where the next
Glock may spring from. The main sponsor of that bill may have additional information if you contact their office.
In answer to your other question, here is a link to when Mack will be in Michigan:
http://www.google.com/search?q=sheriff+richard+mack+clinton+county&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
Have a safe weekend
The Best Guns And Freedom Video Around (0nly 7.5 minutes)
In short order, this video slices through the spin and clearly exposes the truth about gun control. So tastefully done it will open the eyes of many a fence sitter who's
started noticing the bad smell coming from DC. VIDEO [link below]
Grace and Peace,
-Bob
~submitted by Robert L
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_T-F_zfoDqI
Just fair warning, this one is a tad bit long, even for me.
My last article garnered a comment from someone I know that proves that I was right when I said that most people couldn’t name even five of the rights protected by
the Bill of Rights. This person, who I won’t mention, but who knows who they are, said that I was nuts because we can still exercise all our rights. So I asked them to
name five of the rights, just as the article said. The first thing they said was freedom of speech, followed by a long pause. So I prodded, what else? Then they blurted
out I plead the fifth. To which I replied, you ought to before you make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have. Of course that didn’t go over too well, but it
proved my point that most people CAN’T name the rights which our Founders felt were so important that they listed them individually in the Bill of Rights
.READ MORE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INTERNET KEEPING KIDS FROM GRANDPARENTS
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxxx@att.net
To: Bonnie
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Internet Keeping Kids from Grandparents
- I just read online the headline of how the Internet is keeping kids from grandparents...so it goes besides gaming that is destroying families but it said that because
kids can find out whatever they need to know from internet they don't need to go to grandma any longer for any wisdom. Sad...
[My thought: I decided to post this because it speaks volumes to what has happened across our country. A sense of family, values, virtue, principles and our
American Heritage is no longer being passed along from generation to generation. Our children are no longer being taught the true history of our founding but instead
are being programmed by the propaganda machine referred to as state (public) schools. So, if our heritage from our parents and grandparents is being replaced with the
Internet, we've truly lost our nation folks. We are just as complicit for failing to protect our children from those that will use them for profit and power<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RUSSIA BANS IMPORTS OF US BEEF, POULTRY - COMMENT SENT TO SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW
- ----- Original Message -----
From: C. Forster
To: "Senator Debbie Stabenow" <senator@stabenow.senate.gov>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:47 PM
Subject: Russia Bans imports of us beef,poultry
From Charlie Forster [mailing address removed for privacy] Jones Michigan 49061
DEFACTO Senator Stabenow,
I seen the article in my local farm paper about Russia Banning beef and poultry imports due to Ractopamine additive. The Russians are well within their rights to
ban not only due to the Ractopamine but also all the GMO grains these animals have digested in their lives. They should also be banned in The United States. You
may disagree due to your political ties but when you put this feed out and the mice and rats don't eat it, you know something is wrong, And what about all the
chemicals they are incorporating in the seeds? This just has to be poisoning our and other people. Oh well just go down and enjoy a RoundUp ready steak for
supper and rinse it down with some RoundUp ready Soy Milk. Charlie
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RERE GUN LAWS - Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: Bonnie
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: rere gun laws
Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
- "Haynes, a convicted felon, was convicted of unlawful possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun. He argued that for a convicted felon to register a
gun was effectively an announcement to the government that he was breaking the law and that registration violated his Fifth Amendment protection against self-
incrimination. The court, by an 8 – 1 margin, agreed, concluding: “We hold that a proper claim of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination provides
a full defense to prosecutions either for failure to register a firearm…or for possession of an unregistered firearm.” (Summary from American Rifleman, March
2000, page 20) So, when these gun registration schemes are announced, be aware that only lawful gun-owners are required to register their firearms. Unlawful
owners are exempted from registration laws due to their constitutional protection against self-incrimination."
I think this goes back to when they started the barrel and stock length rules.shot gun 18 and 8 rifle 16 and 8. This was done to discourage the gangsters short 12 ga
pistol etc. BTW one that is cut at the pistol grip and for end will have a bad muzzle jump while one that is just legal length will do a fine job and handle fast enough.
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 28, 2013 ONE OF THE PEOPLE SPEAKING OUT - REPLY TO PHIL CAVANAGH
From: Melissa
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:54 PM
To: Bonnie
Subject: Re: FW: info
I have received a response from one of the reps and I have written him back.
Phil Cavanagh,
"there are a number of bills that deal with various aspects of firearm regulation including weapon free zones". Do you realize that there is a law called the Dick Act of
1903, which states that there is no law that shall take away the second amendment. Are all of you, as representatives confused about who put you in office and why?
There should be absolutely NO LAWS that impede or take away the second amendment, and that includes assault rifles. Where is your authority? The people did not
give you that power. "While I support the 2nd amendment and all rights guaranteed by the Constitution, I believe that weapons capable of such mass destruction can be
regulated without impinging upon our Constitutional rights." In this statement I hear a lot of "I support, and I believe. There are a lot of I's in your answer, sir. Again,
your opinion is not the reason that you are in the position that you are in and why "WE THE PEOPLE" are paying your huge salary as many are out of work and can
barely feed their children. OUR OPINION IS THE ONLY OPINION THAT SHOULD SHINE THROUGH WHEN A BILL OR A DISCUSSION COMES UP IN THE
STATE CONGRESS!! Again, you are confused as to the duty of your stay in office which is only because others put you there. We continue to get these type of
letters back from representatives that state thank you for your opinion and I will try to keep it in mind when "I" make a decision. Please keep this in mind that "WE
THE PEOPLE" have sat back and allowed unchecked power to grow like a cancer but now we are growing in numbers and there will be a major house cleaning of
representatives that have THEIR OWN OPINION and AGENDA'S, which are controlled by lobbyists. No more!
Also, where is my letter or statement from you about the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and a so called, "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE" in the state
of Michigan. "WE THE PEOPLE" did not vote on this POWER GRAB and most people do not even understand or know that it exists. This information has gone viral
and it will catch on. I am expecting an explanation as to why this has come to fruition and what you sir, Phil Cavanagh have done to stop DHS whom has no authority
whatsoever, via the tenth amendment. If this is allowed to happen what will you be doing for an occupation and to feed your children? I will be looking forward to
your detailed explanation to these questions. I have posted all letters, including mine from Representatives on the internet for "WE THE PEOPLE" to view.
Sincerely,
Melissa
Concerned Citizen of the state of Michigan and "WE THE PEOPLE" -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO UCC 1-308
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FEED A FAMILY OF FOUR FOR ONE YEAR FOR LESS THAN $300
This plan is THE fastest, cheapest and easiest way to start a food storage program. You are done in a weekend. AND there are no hassles with rotating. Pack it and
forget. It’s space efficient – everything is consolidated into a few 5-gallon buckets. You’ll sleep content in knowing that you have a one-year food supply on hand for
your family should you ever need. READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard
[My thought: This could be used for low income families on a fixed income to stretch their ability to feed their family, especially if cuts to food stamps take place. As a
Naturopathy doctor I live by this rule, " I eat to survive, I don't survive to eat".<><]
February 26, 2013 2ND Amendment Preservation Act Email Conversation between Mr. Forster and Rep. Mike Shirkey, District 65 PDF
As with most email dialogues that are forwarded, one must scroll down, then scroll back up while reading for the correct order of the conversation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I filled out a web form for Congressman Benishek and Representative Kivela for District 1 on both issues. I only received a thank you from Rep.Kivela but here is the
read back from Congressman Benishek 2nd Amendment Constitution Free Notice
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LIST OF DEFACTO REPRESENTATIVES EMAIL CONTACT ADDRESSES DOC
All the names and email addresses are listed in the Doc above. Just copy and paste your District Representative. A big "thank you" to Cathy for the time spent
gathering all the names and addresses.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ron Paul: “When They Came For The Raw Milk Drinkers…”
——————————
February 25, 2013 The Doc Swat Team Milk Raid—While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be disarmed: ——
Federal Agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty. Too often
Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and the federal bureaucracy.
For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s founder, 65-year
old James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese to willing customers – in a state
where raw milk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit!
www.silverdoctors.com/ron-paul-when-they-came-for-the-raw-milk-drinkers/#more-22176
From what I've read they took the farms inventory of thousands of dollars and the farm is now filing for bankruptcy– Where else can a thing like this happen– besides a
free country like America —-
~submitted by Edge—
[My thought: This is the tyranny that is going on daily across our country and the people cower away and allow innocent hard-working people to lose all they have
because they are competition for the mega corporations. These are the real criminals and I agree with Ron Paul, if anyone should be disarmed it is these Federal
Agencies that are terrorizing innocent Americans that are just trying to survive. We all need to revisit our Declaration of Independence I think <><]
February 25, 2013 RUGER HAS MADE IT SIMPLE
-----Original Message-----
From: isaiah
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:17 AM
To: XXXXX
Subject: Re: Ruger has made it simple
THE FIRST LINE MAKES YOU DECLARE YOU ARE A GUN OWNER!! OUR 2and Amendment PRESERVATION ACT [see below] DOES NOT
PUT YOU ON A GUN OWNERS LIST!!!! You do it yourself!! We email and snail mailed both the Notice and the Preservation act. When you do it your
self it has more meaning than those mass mailings and they don't even look at them!
We hope every one will take the time to snail mail three envelopes for each issue and also email. Time is short!!
I think Ruger is one of those company's bought out by George Soros under one of his Illuminati fence names AND ONE CAN ONLY WONDER
WHERE HIS NAME WENT!
Charlie
On 02/25/2013 01:18 AM, XXXXX wrote:
> Ruger has made it simple!
> Go to the link and follow the simple prompts.
>
> http://www.ruger.com/micros/advocacy/takeAction.html
>
> Ruger has made it easy for you to contact your Local and National Representatives. It only takes about 2 minutes and sends a pro-2nd Amendment
email to everyone from the president down to your local state reps.
`submitted by Gray Beard
Governor, but at least your Representatives, and send them separately so as not to confuse the two very serious issues. Beware of BIG CORPORATIONS, and it is
best to independently as THE PEOPLE to give Congress a DIRECTIVE first hand, not through one of THEIR SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS. Our Constitutional
Rights do not come from CORPORATE POLICIES. If we play their game it is feeding the corporate beast, as THE PEOPLE, lets stop doing this and let our unalienable
rights be the foundation we stand on and demand they honor their oaths or step down from their "governance" of the people.. This is how we restore our de jure
republic. Link for defacto state citizen guide above for your convenience. <><]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Smart Meters" & EMR: The Health Crisis Of Our Time - Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt VIDEO
I sent this to our city manager, Senator Vincent Gregory and Vicki Barnett. I will, time willing, send to all the representatives. ~submitted by Cathy C
[My note: If you are pregnant, planning to have children, know someone that is, or already have children it would behoove you to watch the above video for the sake of
your child's health as well as your own. Please become proactive in managing your own health and that of your children. Follow Cathy's lead and do the same, send
this information to your representatives. They need to hear from the people that we are NOT going to quietly go along with this destruction created by big corporations
for profit <><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority -(NSEA) WISHES TO ALIGN WITH International Common Law Court of Justice -(ITCCS)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Murphy
Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Subject: NSEA wishes to aline with ITCCS
To: hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com
3 ATTACHMENTS: Notice to Clerk of District Court 2-8013- Full Notice Clean Water Contingency Program 2012 Sewer Rats
Dear Secretariat,
Please convey to Kevin Annett our wish for the National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority’s (“NSEA”) to align with ITCCS so as to convene our common law
courts in alignment with and under the same name of International Common Law Court of Justice. We at NSEA have developed a notice and contract document
(attached) to serve to all the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTs in America. Currently, grand jury quorums of a pool of twenty-three (23) are being formed in
every State by our people in every State. A tribunal of three justices will be selected from the pool [of non-U.S. citizens] to hear any case regarding crimes against
humanity and genocide.
We will be bringing actions against public servants (employees of private corporations impersonating public servants) who are complicit with the crimes of genocide
being perpetrated upon the American people by knowingly contributing to the poisoning of the people’s drinking water resources in violation of the Public Law 92-500
Clean Water Act. The UNITED STATES “UNLAWFUL” WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, owned by the Vatican and dba the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and
STATE governments, has been operating in violation of the Clean Water Act now for over 40 years. It is the one crime they are all guilty of….and it is a “strict
liability” statute that attached criminal penalties. We have already completed an investigative report on Janet Napolitano, who was found to have a slush fund in the
Vatican Bank as the result of your efforts, for extorting of the people of Lake Havasu City of $1.8 Billion dollars when she was Attorney General and Governor of
Arizona. She is going to be one of the first…along with Obama and company. I also wish to confirm if the USEPA Administrator Lisa Jackson had a slush fund in the
Vatican Bank.
The so-called UNITED STATES [INC.] government impersonators are actually doing business as a Vatican owned, co-corporation of the London municipal
wastewater management utility since 1871, also known as the UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY that has been unlawfully operating since July 1, 1973.
Over 35,000 people each month (just in America, NOT including Canada) are dying from just cancer due to toxic/acidic drinking water conditions as a result of this
grave omission/refusal of these Vatican Criminal Genocidests to administer federal health code, the at-source containment and control required by the congressionally
mandated regulations of the Clean Water Act, and that is JUST the beginning.
Since 40% of all municipal revenue nationally was the result to wastewater management revenues, Nixon, a member of the bar…who is in fact the ones put in power to
protect the Vatican/Crown/City of London/IMF investments, specifically the largest industry in the world, the $500 Billion dollar a year UNITED STATES
WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, put the BAR in charge of all “courts,” in actuality… mere “administrative agencies” having ZERO judicial authority. The people NEVER
gave judicial powers to “private corporations.” The U.S. courts, from the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS, the
STATE SUPERIOR COURTS and MUNICIPAL COURTS are the “gate keepers” charged to “get rid of” any action that would threaten their criminal UNITED
STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY racketeering influenced corrupt organization (“R.I.C.O.”) run enterprise.
The BAR is charged with protecting and maintaining the unlawful wastewater management practice of poisoning the people feeding their other primary criminal
enterprises, i.e. insurance, health care and pharmaceutical, all to create unjust enrichments and ill-gotten gains. If they had complied with the Clean Water Act of 1972
[spurred by JFK], they would have been out of business by 1985, the year all public sewers were to be outlawed as the primary national goal of the United States
Congress as defined in the Clean Water Act.
Further, as a member of the “wastewater industry” since 1972, I am a federal witnesses to their unlawful practice of knowingly unlawfully discharging 65 plus known
toxic pollutants/hazardous substances associated with domestic sewage, listed on the USEPA Toxic Pollutant List, uncontained and uncontrolled (as mandated by the
Clean Water Act), at every onshore facility in north America, including Canada, such to be operating in compliance with the requirements of the congressionally
mandated standards of performance and pretreatment requirements of the Clean Water Act. However, only approximately 20 onshore facilities are containing and
controlling these poisons. This mission of genocide, premeditated murder upon the people of America and Canada, is controlled by the Vatican “sewer rats.” They
have knowingly, with intent to harm, converted every home, i.e. or building having a toilet, into a “chemical and biological weapon of mass destruction,” unlawfully
discharging poisons by exfiltration and direct discharge into our nations drinking water resources. Now, you have exposed them to be what we have been claiming.
We have already conveyed to the public in several documentations over the past two years (see attached) the enemy is the Vatican, International Monetary Fund, City
of London, the Crown, and the Guild of London from which comes all members of the BAR who are controlling America right now, killing, stealing and destroying
“us.”
What you have recently done is awesome! Thank you!
We at NSEA.US wish to support and expand the mission of ITCCS into the true united states for America. In order to do that, we wish to provide the name of our
court in Section 3.4 of the “notice-contract” (attached) which will be sent to the district courts, to be defined as: The International Court of Record of Justice. NSEA
has already executed a joint powers agreement with the 11th tribe of the Cherokee Republic and have been adopted as an Elder advisor to the tribe.
Accordingly, “International” is also the proper identification of venue for our court of record. We wish to align with you and your program and assist in your pursuit
of justice. We could implement the “North America Reclamator Program.” The program would restore government, clean water, good health and economic stability
throughout North America. Additionally, our “New Water Source Utility” has been approved to receive “debt forgiven funds” of up to $180 Billion available to
implement technology that transforms raw sewage into pure potable healthy water and generates enough electricity to sustain a home. However, we must first get
these government imposters out of our way. This is why the people must be able to convene their common law courts.
We would also hope that the alignment of NSEA and ITCCS could also bring a certain level of benefit to your efforts. For us, we see the relationship to be very
beneficial to both parties and in the interest of mankind at large. For this reason, we wish to have your blessings on our using the name of the court, International
Common Law Court of Record.
Please contact me pursuant to the information below to discuss further.
Keep up the good work and may God bless you,
Tom Murphy
Private Attorney-General
National Standards Enforcement Authority
“an in capita sovereign body authority of the people”
http://www.nsea.us/
http://www.reclamator.com/
775-848-8800
~submitted by Cathy C
February 24, 2013 STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT - MICHIGAN CONGRESS COPIED
From: isaiah
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Bonnie Frownfelter
Cc: Governor Rick Snyder; Senator John Proos; State Rep Adam Zemke; State Rep Al Pscholka; State Rep Alberta Tinsley - Talabi; State Rep Amanda Price; State Rep
Andrea LaFontaine; State Rep Andrew Kandrevas; State Rep Andy Schor; State Rep Anthony Forlini; State Rep Aric Nesbitt; State Rep Ben Glardon; State Rep Bill
Lavoy; State Rep Bill Rogers; State Rep Bob Genetski; State Rep Brad Jacobsen; State Rep Brandon Dillon; State Rep Brian Banks; State Rep Bruce Rendon; State Rep
Charles Brunner; State Rep Charles Smiley; State Rep Cindy Denby; State Rep Collene Lamonte; State Rep Dale Zorn; State Rep Dan Lauwers; State Rep Dave Pagel;
State Rep David Knezek; State Rep David Nathan; State Rep David Rutledge; State Rep Dian Slavens; State Rep Douglas Geiss; State Rep Earl Poleski; State Rep Ed
McBroom; State Rep Eileen Kowall; State Rep Ellen Lipton; State Rep Frank Foster; State Rep Fred Durhal; State Rep Gail Haines; State Rep George Darany; State Rep
Greg MacMaster; State Rep Gretchen Driskell; State Rep Harold Haugh; State Rep Harvey Santana; State Rep Henry Yanez; State Rep Hugh Crawford; State Rep Jase
Bolger; State Rep Jeff Farrington; State Rep Jeff Irwin; State Rep Jim Ananich; State Rep Jim Stamas; State Rep Jim Townsend; State Rep Joel Johnson; State Rep
John Kivela; State Rep John Olumba; State Rep John Walsh; State Rep Jon Bumstead; State Rep Jon Switalski; State Rep Joseph Graves; State Rep Joseph Haveman;
State Rep Kate Segal; State Rep Ken Goike; State Rep Ken Yonker; State Rep Kenneth Kurtz; State Rep Kevin; State Rep Kevin Daley; State Rep Klint Kesto; State Rep
Kurt Heise; State Rep Lisa Lyons; State Rep Marcia Hover Wright; State Rep Margaret O'Brien; State Rep Marilyn Lane; State Rep Martin Howrylak; State Rep Matt
Lori; State Rep Mike Callton; State Rep Mike McCready; State Rep Mike Shirkey; State Rep Nancy Jenkins
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT
Dear Michigan elected official,
adopt the below document as soon as possible
Thank you
Charlie Forster
Jones MI
49061
- STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation ACT.” To prevent
federal infringement on the right to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States. WE The People of Michigan ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: We The People OF Michigan find that:
A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the
right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
A. We The People OF Michigan declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as
given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this State,and shall not be recognized by any county, are specifically rejected
by that county, and shall be
considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of each County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws,
orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
SECTION 3 This Second Amendment Right to bear arms applies to ALL arms and ammunition for said arms. The citizenry per the second amendment is
given the right to bear all weapons made available to the military, and ammunition to said weapons is to be readily available, this cannot be infringed upon.
''If the Government is allowed to have it the people (the employers) may have it."
Current Michigan Constitution
§ 6 Bearing of arms. Sec. 6. Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
§ 4 Militia.
Sec. 4. The militia shall be organized, equipped and disciplined as provided by law. History: Const. 1963, Art. III, § 4, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964.Former
constitution: See Const. 1908, Art. XV, §§ 1-3.
- Electors,
Charlie Forster & Bonnie Frownfelter
Jones Mi 49061 Munising, MI 49862
&
WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Michigan
[My note: Please copy and paste the above ACT and present it to your townships and counties councils/commissioners to create an Ordinance to adopt this Act for the
protection of the peoples rights, then give notice to the county sheriff so he is informed and can enforce the ordinance. This is being sent to all the above by USPS.<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MICHIGAN SEAT BELT LAW -TICKET
----- Original Message -----
From: Donald F
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:41 AM
Subject: Seat belt ticket
Well it happened. The ticket that I said if I ever got, I would be really angry. This is the most Un-Constitutional nonsense ever!
Imagine a cop having nothing better to do than peak through your vehicle windows and see if you have your seat belt on! Tell me WE are not just a resource to milk for
money?! This fits under the "unreasonable search and seizure" category doesn't it? A cop can say, "It didn't look like you had your seat belt on, so what else is going on
today?" That's bull crap!!! We are not free, why do we keep deluding ourselves?
So, I'm driving through the little town of Mancelona like I do 3 times a week for the last 10 years. Barney Fife is sitting at a gas station facing the highway, waves to a
"buddy" heading north, turns to look my way as I was passing at just the perfect time, I was heading south, and whips out behind me. You know that feeling you get
when you know for sure it's you they are coming for. Another guy was right on my tail with a full size pick-up so the LEO couldn't see me right away from the time he
pulled out, so I had pulled my belt on knowing that was the only reason he could pull me over. I thought, "there ya go ya pot licker, got it on now". He lights em up, I
pull over and he says, "I'm enforcing the seat belt law today and you have to have it on before I see you didn't, license and registration" or something like that. I told
him "I have a CPL", he says "OK". I give him "my papers" he heads back to "generate some revenue" with his pen.
When he comes back to my window I thought I'd share my feelings with him, I said, "When you became a "Peace Officer" (look up the difference between that and a
LEO if you don't know) did you ever think you would be nothing more than a revenue generator?" His eyes bugged out and he got real nervous, he realized he wasn't
talking to a sheep. He said, "Our department only gets $3 per seat belt fine" I said, "I don't care, do you know there are real criminals around here, Meth Labs, drug
dealers, and here you are wasting your time with me, a tax paying, law abiding Citizen, why don't you go and catch some real bad guys!?" Somewhere in my ranting I
told him that I "wear my seat belt religiously and I would see him in court" because I had it on, I figured it's his word against mine. He wanted to tell me a story about
safety and try to be my "buddy" and I said, "Just give me the ticket, I don't need to listen to your preaching". Then he got that shocked look again and with shaking
hands pointed at the ticket to explain what I needed to do, about calling this number and marking the boxes, you know.
I felt pretty good about enlightening him about "bull crap laws" and how one Citizen anyway, ain't gonna take it. Now I have to go and fight this crap in court, anyone
have any experience at this and want to give me some advice?
If WE as a people don't get mad as hell and fight this crap WE are going to be corralled into a pen and charged with "chewing gum in bondage"!
If you still don't "get it", as I have a diverse audience here and you think "what's the big deal Don, pay the ticket and move on". Please tell me that, so I can remove you
from my mailing list, there really is no hope for you and you really should just go get your "chip" now and save the Powers that Be alot of hassle.
Just thought you might like to enjoy a story that happened "close to home". Taking any advice offered. Your friend, Don
]My note: If anyone has any suggestions for Don to assist him in court please contact me and I will get you in touch with him. Let's help one another folks to restore
our de jure republic of, by, and for the people. The POLICE STATE, called Michigan needs to be dismantled. <><]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bulletin Board -NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS -PUBLICATION IN FREE PRESS
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
• NOTICE
NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this notice to all branches
of Congress and local government that have sworn an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution.
This notice is to let all members of congress and local government know you are very close, if not already, in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your
employment by the people of Michigan. It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional
decree. HLS does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.Entire notice at:www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/notice.html
From Detroit Free Press & The Detroit News on 2013-02-24
http://www.michigan.com/classifieds/#420/70 [Runs for seven days in print and online
February 21, 2013 NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE DEFACTO MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this NOTICE to all branches of Congress and local government that have sworn
an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution. This notice is to let all members of
congress and local government know you are very close, if not already in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your employment by the
people of Michigan.
It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional decree. Homeland Security
(HLS) does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone. Read complete NOTICE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - WHAT CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN IS DOING - A model for others to implement
Original message
From: isaiah
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:39 AM
To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
Cc: xxxxx xxxxxx
Subject: LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
xxxxxx,
FYI this is the one from Indiana
Make ours very similar!
IF the Fed wants to cut grants or sharing funds we can cut out all their income!!
xxxxx
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/franklin-county-indiana-passes-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance/
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/franklin-county-commissioners-sign-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance-into-law
Here is the language of the ordinance:
LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the right to keep and bear
arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN
COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The Franklin County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well
regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders,
rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
A. The Franklin County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as given by the
Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county, are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be
considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws, orders, rules, or
regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act takes effect upon approval by the
Franklin County Board of Commissioners
------------------------copy and paste the following to an email and send to county council members or commissioners in your township or county ------------
- LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - _______________________________County, Michigan.
An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the
right to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS OF __________________ COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The _______________________ County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
A. The ________________County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future –
in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate
its true meaning and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by
this county, are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws,
orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act
takes effect upon approval by the _____________________County Board of Commissioners. DOC PDF
~submitted by Gray Beard
[My note: this is what everyone in Michigan should start working on in their townships and counties, (change county to township in above form, and commissioners
to the terminology used in your area if different). People really need to start showing up to the council (commissioners) meetings in their township and counties. As
you meet people at these meetings form jural assemblies of the people to transition the “corporate commissioners” into a de jure republic voice of, by, and for the
people instead of the machine it now is to further the corporate/socialist/communist/democratic/progressive/collectivist control agenda.<><]
February 20, 2013 RESOLUTION VS. ORDINANCE - Gilberton, PA WHY CAN'T WE DO THIS IN MICHIGAN?
From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: resolution VS Ordinance
The paper was calling it a Resolution but the actual wording is Ordnance. The thing to remember is that a resolution has no force of law. The ordnance will give the
twp the opportunity to instruct the county sheriff to remove the Feds. See if you can get an ordnance adopted in your area. Mine is looking at it
Isaiah
-----------------------------------------------------
Resolution vs. Ordinance
Gilberton, PA is a small borough in Schuylkill County, with a population of about 840, but the little community took a big stand Thursday night. “It`s about time that
the little guy stands up to the government and says we don`t want any change. This is the purpose of this. We want to continue to have our Second Amendment rights,
the right to bear arms and the right to choose,” said Mayor Mary Lou Hannon of Gilberton.
Borough council members unanimously passed a resolution in support of the Second Amendment at a packed council meeting. The resolution is also in opposition to
any local, state or federal regulations of firearms.
The resolution was the borough police chief’s idea and supported by dozens of folks who packed into the council meeting room, who applauded when council
members approved it. READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 19, 2013 MCMILLIN BILL SEEKS TO AVERT FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF SCHOOL CURRICULUM -District 45, Rochester Hills
State Rep. Tom McMillin today introduced legislation that prevents the federal government from imposing federal standards, curriculum and testing on local schools, all
of which constitute unfunded - and mostly undefined - mandates.
House Bill 4276 removes the state from participation in the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which McMillin said is a federal attempt to take decision-making
abilities from state and local school officials.
"We are expected to blindly accept these standards from the federal government, which thinks it knows what Michigan schoolchildren need in terms of curriculum
better than we do," said McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. "This is an obvious overreach by the federal government into our classrooms and we should join the other states
that have opted out of the initiative. The federal government should not dictate what is taught in every classroom in the nation, especially in Michigan." READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C
[My thought: This is a good start for Michigan to start enacting the Tenth Amendment, but it needs to be enacted across the board for all unconstitutional over-
stepping powers by the Federal Corporation government and not just the ones that step on certain toes. The local communities should take back the control of their
schools and curriculum from the state. <><]
February 18, 2013 READ THE 1963 CONSTITUTION - WHICH ISN'T A CONSTITUTION AT ALL- BUT A CORPORATE CONTRACT
I suggest everyone take a look at the operating Constitution of Michigan, which is the 1963 Version, the later rulings are included with reference at the bottom of each
section. Two points of interest, first the watered down generic oath of office, Article XI reads:
Sec. 1. Oath of Public Officers. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of this
state, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of ________________________ according to the best of my ability."
They will "support", what happened to protect, defend, or uphold the Constitution? Absolutely no accountability with such an ambiguous word as "support." but given
the fact that this is clearly a Corporate Contract and not a Constitution of, by, and for the people of Michigan it really is not surprising. Second point of interest is
found in Article IX:
- Sec. 1. Taxes for state expenses. The Legislature shall impose taxes sufficient with other resources to pay the expenses of state government.
Sec. 2. Power of taxation, relinquishment. The power of taxation shall never be surrendered, suspended or contracted away.
there How many people in Michigan have even read this Corporate Contract, or recognize it as such.
No wonder Michigan was picked to become a "pilot police state", and perhaps that is the very reason the first implementation of fluoride into drinking water was
introduced in Grand Rapids first, before it went throughout the state and on to other states. Now Michigan is a "Constitution Free Zone" by decree from Homeland
Security, and what legislation has been put in place by our Michigan Congress to "support" the Constitutional Fourth Amendment, since they have the "support" of the
Tenth Amendment to do so. They are paid to represent the people of Michigan and to "SUPPORT" the Constitution, so it is their duty to create Legislation to "Support"
the Constitutional Rights of the people, that is their job. We should not have to lobby for such protection, not when it comes to the Bill of Rights. The people of
Michigan are already so oppressed due to the POLICE STATE statues, codes and laws, not to mention the over-regulating of everything for so long that the duty of the
Michigan Congress should be to spend time nullifying these repugnant laws for the people, as the representatives of the people.
The Tenth Amendment is all the authority Congress needs to nullify repugnant unconstitutional laws coming out of DC, and if they are not going to do this when it is
THEIR JOB and DUTY to do so, then perhaps a RECALL is in order.
I suggest the people read the three constitution below and contrast the difference, the first is the operating 1963 used by the defacto corporate congress of Michigan,
the second is the original 1835 Constitution, and the third is the 1835 Revised, Ratified Constitution for the De Jure Republic for Michigan.
1963 Constitution operating today by defacto Michigan Congress
1835 First Constitution for Michigan, obtaining statehood
1835 Original Constitution Revised and Ratified for the De Jure Republic for Michigan (Of course it is only provisional)
Citizen Guide to Defacto State Government - This is the current guide for the citizens of Michigan from the defacto Michigan Congress
When I put together the NOTICE to the members of Congress in Michigan, which I'm working on now, it needs to be sent out by you and others in your area as well,
and this can be by email. I will be sending the notice to all members via email and USPS mail, as well as a portion will be published but for the sake of expense readers
will than be directed to a web page set-up for it for more information. This is a group effort that all the people need to let their representatives know what is expected
from them as "paid" representatives for the people. I will send out information and try to make it as easy as possible to take action. The only way we are going to be
able to transition our de jure republic of, by, and for the people back into existence to protect our "Immunities" from an over-stepping tyrannical defacto Federal
Government, and as it would appear, the defacto state level as well is to implement them at our township level by building jural assemblies of the people, and expand
out from there. That is where, we the people have the greatest power.<><
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FACT SHEET ON U.S. "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE"
Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the
US land and coastal borders. The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This "
Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas. (Are You Living In A Constitution Free Zone? See the interactive map >>)
We urge you to call on Congress to hold hearings on and pass legislation to end these egregious violations of Americans' civil rights. FACT SHEET
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Federal Reserve audit exposes major securities fraud and the embezzlement of $16 trillion
An audit of the Federal Reserve has revealed that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly doled out more than $16 trillion in zero interest loans to some of the
largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world. The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the
Fed acted illegally. In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to its employees and private contractors so they could keep
investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans. The report is evidence that reveals major securities fraud in the
embezzlement of $16 trillion by the Federal Reserve.
$16 trillion is 10 times more than what the U.S. Congress authorized and Bush ($700 billion) and Obama ( $787 billion) signed off on. The Federal Reserve was only
authorized by Congress to use $1.487 trillion in federal tax dollars in bailouts. The Federal Reserve embezzled another $14.5 trillion.
The Congressional report determined that the Fed secretly hide most of the embezzled money into their own banks. The rest the Fed unilaterally transferred trillions of
dollars to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland. Foreign banks and corporations which the Federal Reserve bankers had a personal financial
interest or stake in. ARTICLE
February 17, 2013 IS THERE ANYONE HAVING TROUBLES WITH YOUR HOMEOWNERS, OR COUNTRY ESTATE INSURANCE?
- From: isaiah
To: Bonnie
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Insurance
A thought for you, can you put a question on one of the web pages and see if others are having troubles with their ins co?
Is there anyone out there having troubles with your homeowners or country estate insurance ?
if so reply here? EMAIL
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You Can't Ban Evil
This young lady hits the nail on the head, telling a side of the gun control issue that unfortunately most have either never thought about or pretend to be ignorant as to
the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment! (You know for a fact that the self-serving politicians in Washington know the intent and purpose of the 2nd Amendment
but want to exercise their power and control over us and are afraid their corrupt regime might be overthrown some day!) Take a couple minutes to listen to what a very
bright young black woman has learned...LISTEN
February 15, 2013 Oath Keepers » Stewart Rhodes Speaks at Albany New York Gun Rights Rally on February 12
Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes gave a fiery speech to approximately 3,000 New York gun owners, urging them to refuse to comply to the “SAFE Act,” to
refuse to disarm, to nullify at every level. He also urged them to make sure their county was a “Molon Labe” county, asking them “is your county a ‘come and take it’
county, or is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!” He told them to make sure all the gun owners and veterans in their county are ready to
stand up, and will commit to refuse to comply, and then go to the sheriff and the police chief of their town and put them on notice that they are expected to choose
sides. He told the crowd to use April 19, 2013, the upcoming anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord, in 1775, as the deadline for their sheriff, police chiefs
[and all other oath sworn public servants] to choose sides — “are they patriots, or are they redcoats?” at the rally Oath Keepers had the effigies of Cuomo, Schumer,
Bloomberg, and other oath breaking traitors dressed up in red coats, with signs hanging around their necks saying “Oath Breaker,” “Red Coat” and “Traitor”
Then retired New York State Police (Highway Patrol) officer John Wallace, a member of Oath Keepers, led thousands of New Yorkers in an oath renewal/oath taking
ceremony, pledging to defend the Constitution and to not disarm WATCH
[My thought: It is my hope there can be peaceful resolution, that all the newly sworn oath keepers will take this oath back to their communities to help more people to
STAND UP and claim what is already ours,and always has been, but to do so with a calm, firm RESOLVE using their VOICE to kick the progressives out of their
communities and reinstate new laws of, by, and for the people in accordance with the Constitution - Bill of Rights, standing on first our God given Rights, next our
Declaration of Independence given to us by our very wise forefathers. We do NOT ACQUIESCE, and all we have to do is TELL THEM<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ONE EASY LESSON
----- Forwarded Message ----
Sent: Thu, February 14, 2013 11:20:09 AM
Subject: One Easy Lesson
Greetings and Salutations on this Happy Valentine's Day,
We all have busy/full lives. If you have not taken the time to become familiar with UN Agenda 21/Sustainability/Place Making/Smart Growth/Walking Community, etc.,
you Need to do so. Go to the site at the very bottom.
I have previously sent out info regarding this topic, made two presentations to my local Boyne City Commissioners, and more. I just came upon this site and found it
concise as well as an excellent source for additional related info. There is so much information out there, but requires some digging/time.
The common rebuttal by those that are knowingly or unknowingly involved is that it is partisan, we just use the same terms, fear mongering by the Tea Party, a
conspiracy theory, the UN has no control over us, etc.
Many who are strongly into conservation and the environment are finding they have been infiltrated and being used by this agenda. Many groups and ideas initially had
good intentions which were introduced and talked about with very nice community friendly verbiage, but are really being manipulated by ICLEI and others often
through acquiring grants only after becoming a member. Grant writing, if you have not noticed, has become a new art form.
Follow the money, as some of it comes from our tax dollars through the EPA and other agencies in our government. Did they need Congressional Approval? Other
money comes from foundations like the Kellogg Foundation, Tides Foundation, and other huge money pots. Just research the sources of their funding.
This is very organized, tenacious, well funded and wears Many Masks. Behind the Green Mask is a book written by Rosa Koire whose web site www.
democratsagainstunagenda21.com is found on the site at the bottom.
Our potus plans much more for his (O for A)
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Organizing_for_America. You heard or heard about his plans for the future on many topics in his S of the U. One is the
Environment (made into the new religion). He plans on changes even if Congress does not comply.....yet more Exec. Orders. People will be entering our communities
or people already there using the avenues already in place to start small and grow. Just like the population, where do you begin to indoctrinate, with the easiest and the
youngest of us, our children. Make sure you know what your children/grandchildren are learning in school, reading, and watching on TV (now there is another
interesting topic). So this idea has and is going to get stronger, so be very aware of what is going on in your communities, counties, state regions, states, etc. When
you can and need to...Speak Up. Being Forewarned is Forearmed Nothing worse than being Blindsided. This is only one of many issues. Scary!
• one easy lesson - What Is Agenda 21
whatisagenda21.net/agenda21.htm
All part of Agenda 21 policy. Economic Prosperity? Public Private Partnerships (PPP). ... ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, ...
Be Well, God Bless You and Yours, and God Bless America Carole
Carpe Diem,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ACQUIESCE
- 1828 Definition ACQUIESCE, v.i. acquiess'. [L. acquiesco, of ad and quiesco, to be quiet; quies, rest.]
1. To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent; usually implying previous opposition, uneasiness, or dislike, but
ultimate compliance, or submission; as, to acquiesce in the dispensations of providence.
2. To assent to, upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; that is, to rest satisfied of its correctness, or propriety.
Acquiesced in, in a passive sense, complied with; submitted to, without opposition; as, a measure has been acquiesced in.1913 DefinitionAcquiesce
(acquiesce)
v. i. ((?))
Ac`qui*esce"
[imp. *** p. p. Acquiesced (&?]); p. pr. *** vb. n. Acquiescing (&?])] [L. acquiescere; ad + quiescere to be quiet, fr. quies rest: cf. F. acquiescer. See
1.To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent (usually implying previous opposition or discontent); to accept or
consent by silence or by omitting to object; -- followed by in, formerly also by with and to.
They were compelled to acquiesce in a government which they did not regard as just.
De Quincey.
1.To concur upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; to assent to; usually, to concur, not heartily but so far as to forbear opposition.
Syn. -- To submit; comply; yield; assent; agree; consent; accede; concur; conform; accept tacitly.
How is the DEFACTO US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT able to do all they do? Because by our SILENCE, we ACQUIESCE. It is time to speak up, and let them
KNOW we do NOT ACQUIESCE peaceably, but with firm RESOLVE.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMPORTANT FOR PERIMETER STATES (MICHIGAN IS ONE) [CONSTITUTION FREE ZONES - MAP]
DHS Nullifies Fourth Amendment Rights of Millions of Americans
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution reads:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The Department of Homeland Security doesn’t believe in the Fourth Amendment and has recently issued statements to that affect. They are claiming that if you live
within 100 miles of the international border that they have the right to search all electronic devices, including cell phones and laptop and tablet computers without
probable cause or first securing a warrant. The 100 mile distance is being referred to as the border security search zones.
This would include cities such as San Diego, Escondido, El Centro, Yuma, Tucson, Las Cruces, Carlsbad, El Paso, Brownsville, Seattle, Grand Forks, Toledo,
Cleveland, Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Montpelier to name just a few.
But wait, it gets even better! If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey or Rhode
Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state. Let’s not leave New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia out of the fun, because large areas of these states
are also being designated as search zones.
If you live anywhere in any of the designated search zones, the feds claim to have the right to invade your privacy and conduct an unconstitutional search of your
private possessions without any probable cause or warrant. If you ask me, this sounds a lot like the Gestapo under Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany, which is what I
compared the Department of Homeland Security to in an earlier article. This just helps to reinforce my claims. Read more:
~submitted by Cathy C
February 14, 2013 Dr. Edwin Vieira on The Militia - NewsWithViews.TV
Published on Feb 7, 2013
While most of the recent gun-control debate is focused on the individual right to bear arms could it be that we are focusing on the wrong battle? Constitutional expert
Dr. Edwin Vieira joins us to explain that not only is the "Militia" not a four-letter word, but that our Founders determined that it was "necessary for the security of a free
state." Allow Dr. Vieira to explain to you why the need for a "well-regulated militia" is the backbone to the right to keep and bear arms. You will never again look at this
issue in the same way. LISTEN
[My note: This is the most informative information yet concerning our Second Amendment Right, please take the time to listen]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UNALIENABLE
1828 Definition: UNA'LIENABLE, a. Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.
1913 Definition Unalienable (unalienable)
a. Un*al"ien*a*ble (?)
1.Inalienable; as, unalienable rights.
Swift. -- Un*al"ien*a*bly, adv.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Need your ACTION
Circulate this to as many people as you can to sign and send out ASAP
"They deserve a vote,” Obama said last night in his SOTU speech. They being the gun control activists.
Well, us anti gun control activists also deserve a vote…well congressmen Stockman, and Broun have answer the call to KILL ALL GUN CONTROL in the House.
Click on this link to contact your congressman telling them to support corgessmen Stockman, and Broun.
capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=62408466&PROCESS=Take+Action see if you can blast this out…..it’s going viral on FB already………..
Lots of people are talking about stuff to do, but not many are taking action…now is the time for action….
[We also deserved a vote, Mr. Obama, but we didn't get it from Harry Reid!]
~submitted by Cathy C
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ALL WARS ARE BANKERS
I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto
nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample
precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using
printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which
the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-
bearing bank notes. READ MORE LISTEN VIDEO
~submitted by Bulldog75
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WHEN TO SHOOT A COP [Please watch the video before making a snap judgement based on this title]
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx xxxxxxxx
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:44 PM
Subject: When to shoot a cop?
I'm not advocating that, but be honest, if there is never a situation where that may be needed, you might as well prepare to get on the "cattle cars" now!
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CjDHQ16MyKY
[My thought: This was sent to me by someone and they will remain anonymous due to the fear this title invokes in many. Is there a time to shoot a cop, lets rephrase
it with "Is there a time to defend oneself from the criminal intent of another?" The title is suggestive and provokes fear in many people, and the reason for this
is that people are programmed to read, "one liners" from email and text messages that they no longer read the essence of what is truly being said. Before you along
with many others make a quick judgement based solely on the title, please listen to the video and what it is saying. This person is exercising his First Amendment
Right. He is not advocating anything nor suggesting anything other then truth. People have a RIGHT to defend themselves, whether it is with a fist, knife, gun, or ball
bat, and it doesn't matter if it is against a home invader that is a drug dealer, plumber, or that's right police officer that is corrupt and stepping outside his oath of office
and breaking the very laws taken to defend the people, but now is using that position to harm their life, or that of their families. We...as a people need to bring back
truth, honor, and justice to our nation, and especially our state (Tenth Amendment). If we expect to be free we must accept the responsibility of "self-governance" that
comes with that freedom, and part of that responsibility is holding ALL criminals accountable, no matter their office or position. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT
EVEN THOSE THAT ARE IN PLACE TO UPHOLD THE LAW, AND THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEFEND THEIR LIFE AND LIBERTY AGAINST ALL
THAT WOULD TRY TO TAKE IT. In closing I will make this statement, "violence begans violence so it should never be the first choice for resolution, but defending
one's life, family, or neighbor from unjust lethal force is not violence defined by criminal intent, it is Self-Defense, and that is the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of a
FREE PEOPLE <><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE REAL STATE OF THE UNION FOR FEBRUARY 12
Critical condition....
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” George H. W. Bush,
addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. February 1, 1992.....he said WHAT??? READ MORE
~submitted by Judd
February 13, 2013 RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY CONSTITUTION - NOT PROVIDED BY CONSTITUTION!
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rights are protected by Constitution - not provided by Constitution!
There is an un-known number of Americans that support the truths told in this man's letter below. That un-known number is not small by any means. This subject is
being pushed to a head by our government for reasons other than the latest school shooting. The government is merely taking advantage of that tragedy to move
forward with plans they already had in place. As I continue to receive thousands upon thousands of similar pieces to the one I am forwarding below, I know that our
country is headed for real problems as written below. These Americans are not afraid to defend their rights and our current government seems hell-bent on proceeding
with an unconstitutional plan to remove their/our rights, so what do you think will ultimately happen here? Which side of this stand-off will you end up on? Think
about where this problem has come form originally! Did guns get us into this Government against the people situation? Did guns cause our elected leaders to stop
doing their jobs of protecting our nation and us?
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:
Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan , grew up in the Indiana , Illinois , and
Texas , and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan . Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician in West Michigan . His
research in the fields of crime scene investigation and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under the name "D.H. Garrison, Jr."
Subject: If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
Posted on January 3, 2013 by Dean Garrison
I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is
a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this,
however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but
to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. READ MORE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Guns Across America Rally - Michigan Jan 19th 2013
GAA Rally January 19th 2013 State Capitol Building, Lansing Michigan. Freedom lovers and defenders of our Constitution turned out to stand and be counted in a
peaceful and civil demonstration in support of the 2nd Amendment. You're looking at the safest place to be in Michigan on this particular afternoon... Among
responsible and law abiding gun owners! There are three parts , this is number two VIDEO
Anti-Gun Rally Held in Southfield VIDEO
Listen carefully to the last gentleman speaking and what he has to say, very important message. This was recorded by Fox News
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE CREATOR'S "REMEDY"
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: The Creator's "remedy"
Excerpt:
- "WHY won't those in seats of power respect our documents? Because sadly, once any new officials get into any offices (including even those who are truly
well intended) they are quickly but secretly "made aware" of much more than our Constitutional minds previously understood regarding the power that is really
calling the shots. On the surface they WANT you to think that the Constitution can still save us, as this keeps us peasants from searching for and discovering
the real layers where the criminal "slave" system really operates". READ MORE
February 11, 2013 ATTENTION - Constitutional Sheriff's Leadership Call
Anyone interested in learning how Constitutional Sheriff's Association will be attempting to unite the people in the nearly 3,100 counties in local groups. We will be
establishing websites for each county where the people will be able to educate themselves and discuss critical local issues. To restore America we need to begin by
restoring our counties. Please listen to the call live by calling (347)884-9499 or click on the following link and listen to the archived show at your convenience.
The show is schedule for Tuesday, February 11, 2013 at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
Leadership Call for the Constitutional Sheriff's Association
~submitted by WRAM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
GUN CONTROL AND THE CONSTITUTION
Norm:
Please share this article from the Wall Street Journal on the Constitutionality of Gun control.
Thanks much!
Kent
Bellaire
Gun Control and the Constitution
The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First..
By DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. And ANDREW M. GROSSMAN
Could there be a better illustration of the cultural divide over firearms than the White House photograph of our skeet-shooting president? Clay pigeons are launched into
the air, but the president's smoking shotgun is level with the ground. This is not a man who is comfortable around guns. And that goes a long way toward explaining
his gun-control agenda.
Lack of informed presidential leadership aside, there is a gulf between those Americans who view guns as invaluable tools for self-defense, both against private
wrongdoers and a potentially tyrannical government, and those who regard that concept as hopelessly archaic and even subversive. For them, hunting is the only
possible legitimate use of firearms, and gun ownership should be restricted to weapons suited to that purpose.
But while the level of the policy discourse leaves much to be desired, its constitutional dimensions are even more dimly recognized, much less seriously engaged. Yet
the debate over guns, as is the case with many other contentious issues in American history, cannot be intelligently pursued without recognizing its constitutional
dimensions. The Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Heller v. District of Columbia confirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says: "the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
After Heller and its follow-on case, McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the Second Amendment rights to the states, what government cannot do is deny the individual
interest in self-defense. As a legal matter, that debate is settled.
The president and his allies seem to have missed the message, as demonstrated by his continued insistence that most of the American people, including many hunters,
support his proposed gun-control measures. Even if that claim were true, constitutionally protected rights are guarded with particular vigor precisely when public
opinion turns against them. Meanwhile, the president's continued appeals to emotion, capitalizing on a series of tragic mass shootings, also ill-fit what ought to be a
serious and dispassionate discussion.
While the courts are still sorting out Heller's implications, politicians should not assume that they have a free hand to restrict private gun ownership. Decades of case
law interpreting and applying the other provisions of the Bill of Rights show that there are hard-and-fast limits on gun control.
The general framework is straightforward and certainly well-known to those who have studied (let alone taught) constitutional law. The government cannot abridge
constitutionally protected rights simply to make a symbolic point or because it feels that something must be done. Any measure must be justified by a legitimate
government interest that is compelling or at least important. At the same time, any regulation must be "narrowly tailored" to achieve that interest.
On that basis, in a recent case the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on depictions of animal cruelty, rejecting the government's argument that it had any
legitimate interest in banning pictures and videos associated with crimes, and finding—even assuming the government's interest—that the statute swept up too much
protected speech. In this way, judicial balancing requires a careful weighing of the government's interests against the individual's, with a thumb on the scale in favor of
the individual.
But you wouldn't know that from the current gun-control debate. Several states, for example, are considering gun-insurance mandates modeled after those for
automobile insurance. There is no conceivable public-safety benefit: Insurance policies cover accidents, not intentional crimes, and criminals with illegal guns will just
evade the requirement. The real purpose is to make guns less affordable for law-abiding citizens and thereby reduce private gun ownership. Identical constitutionally
suspect logic explains proposals to tax the sale of bullets at excessive rates.
The courts, however, are no more likely to allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than to undermine the First. A state cannot circumvent the right to
a free press by requiring that an unfriendly newspaper carry millions in libel insurance or pay a thousand-dollar tax on barrels of ink—the real motive, in either case,
would be transparent and the regulation struck down. How could the result be any different for the right to keep and bear arms?
The same constitutional infirmity plagues the president's plan. Consider his proposal for a new "assault weapons" ban, targeting a class of weapons distinguished by
their cosmetic features, such as a pistol grip or threaded barrel. These guns may look sinister, but they don't differ from other common weapons in any relevant
respect—firing mechanism, ammunition, magazine size—and so present no greater threat to public safety. Needless to say, the government has no legitimate interest in
banning guns that gun-controllers simply do not like and would not, themselves, care to own.
Also constitutionally suspect are restrictions on magazine size. There is no question that a limit of 10 rounds (as the president has proposed) or seven (as enacted by
New York state last month) would impair the right to self-defense. A magazine with 10 rounds may provide adequate protection against a single nighttime intruder. But
it may not: What if there are two intruders?
Further compounding the constitutional problem is the fact that the benefit of such limits is questionable. For a practiced and calm shooter, swapping magazines takes
no more than a couple of seconds. And a swap may not even be necessary if the shooter has multiple guns, as in several mass shootings in recent years.
While some limit on magazines may be constitutionally permissible, one that falls below the capabilities of guns in common usage for self-defense is probably not. The
most popular guns for self-defense take 15 or so rounds in their default configurations. Given the uncertain benefit of restricting magazine size, not to mention the tens
of millions of "high capacity" magazines in circulation, something near that number may be a constitutional minimum.
And while there is no question that procedural requirements like background checks are permissible, that does not mean that the government may place an undue
burden on the right of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Excessive waiting periods, registration fees and the like are all subject to scrutiny, lest they infringe on
constitutionally guaranteed rights.
At bottom, the Constitution requires sensible and effective regulation of guns that respects and upholds this most fundamental right. Policies motivated by nothing more
than discomfort with firearms, often born of a lack of experience, fall far short.
Messrs. Rivkin and Grossman practice law in the Washington, D.C., office of Baker Hostetler. Mr. Rivkin served in the Justice Department and the White House
Counsel's Office in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
~submitted by Gray Beard
February 09, 2013 Dr. Benjamin Carson's Amazing Speech at the National Prayer Breakfast with Obama Present
Dr. Carson addresses some of the issues facing America today by using sound reasoning and common sense solution, very refreshing... WATCH HERE
February 08, 2013 Carl Miller - The Constitution And The Bill Of Rights
- From: xxxxxx@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:41 PM
To: dejure@jamadots.com
Subject: RE: UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS
I have studies in many subjects. Carl Miller is my champion! Look on youtube for him on constitutional rights. [emphasis added]
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
[My note: I looked for Carl Miller on youtube and of course found him, he's here in Michigan! He shares a lot of information in simple language. VIDEO 1 2 3 ]
February 07, 2013 REQUEST TO GOVERNOR SNYDER ON GUN CONTROL
From: xxxx@my.dialzip.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Rick.Snyder@michigan.gov
Subject: Gun control
Governor Snyder,
This is a request to sign a bill into law a bill prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws or Regulations that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the
Organic Constitution of the United States.
ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable in the Township and
County described.
There is No delegation of power to any member of government to infringe on the Second Amendment!! Thus the term Shall Not Be Infringed!
Note ,The term in the Second Amendment “A Well Regulated Militia.”
Well Regulated has nothing whats so ever to do with any type of government control!
The term means that you are proficient in the use of your arms !
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site
( http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html) along with a lot of other good information.
Home page http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us
Some food for thought in some other Nations like Switzerland where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon's and ammunition in every home and are
required to attend regular training crime is near non existent.
Grey Beard
[My note: It would be great if everyone would email, send a letter, or call with this request to protect the people from the over-stepping power of the Federal
Government, reference the Tenth Amendment and also scroll down to UNODA Article, then go to the Militia page and scroll to read the DICK ACT.
From the Tenth Amendment Center:
- The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United
States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.” – United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733
(1931).
The founding fathers had good reason to pen the Tenth Amendment.
The issue of power – and especially the great potential for a power struggle between the federal and the state governments – was extremely important to the
America’s founders. They deeply distrusted government power, and their goal was to prevent the growth of the type of government that the British has
exercised over the colonies.
Adoption of the Constitution of 1787 was opposed by a number of well-known patriots including Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and others.
They passionately argued that the Constitution would eventually lead to a strong, centralized state power which would destroy the individual liberty of the People.
Many in this movement were given the poorly-named tag “Anti-Federalists.”
The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 largely because of the intellectual influence and personal persistence of the Anti-Federalists and
their allies.
It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers delegated to the federal government. In delegating just
specific powers to the federal government, the states and the people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising their sovereign powers.
When states and local communities take the lead on policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers are that much more
accountable to the people. Few Americans have spoken with their president; many have spoken with their mayor.
Adherence to the Tenth Amendment is the first step towards ensuring liberty in the United States. Liberty through decentralization.
The Bill of Rights is under attack, not just the Second Amendment but all of them in some form or another. They all must stand or none can stand and the over-
reaching power of the Federal Corporate Government is chipping away at them, we need to stop this chipping by NOT COMPROMISING ON ANY OF OUR RIGHTS]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TEXAS DECIDES TO REIN IN, "LIBERAL" CURRICULUM
Texas lawmakers have decided they want to rein in a controversial public school curriculum content and management system that at one point taught “Allah is God."
Most of the state’s classrooms, some 80 percent, are using the CSCOPE program that also has raised eyebrows because educators had refused to allow parents and
others to see what being taught.
Twenty-five state representatives now have signed onto a proposed oversight statute that would target CSCOPE, the online system that set up firewalls and passwords
so that parents would not be able to see the curriculum.
Bill author State Rep. Steve Toth said, “It’s imperative that we bring CSCOPE under the direction and oversight of the locally elected members of the State Board of
Education. Repeated instances of impropriety along with a decidedly liberal leaning agenda makes this move of the utmost importance. ISDs all over the State of Texas
have been misled as to what CSCOPE is and what it contains. We’ve got to get this right.” READ MORE
[My thought: This could be very good for the rest of the country because most of our nations curriculum begins in Texas, but we need parents attending the school
board meetings and find out what their children are "really" being taught. It is our responsibility as parents, NOT the "village" or the UN to decide for us. We must
become actively involved in our children's education, and it has been that inactively that is one of the variables in so many of our children graduating without the ability
to read or comprehend what is being read. Michigan can do this too but we need parents that will stand up and say, "enough". When our schools started programming
propaganda in the 70's by moving away from proper education, that is when many parents decided to home-school their children. It was good for their children and
their education, but unfortunately it did nothing to undo what was taking place in our schools and now we see the results of that shift away from true education to
social programming.<><]
February 06, 2013 [More action being taken by the people] 121101-Citizens Grand Jury Indictment
----- Original Message -----
From: @yahoo.com
To: xxxxx xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Federal Court Indicts [attachment linked above]
This transgression makes Watergate look like something from the sandbox.
This is only the tip of the berg.
xxxx
"If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."
Joe Bannister
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS
Small Arms
Insurgents, armed gang members, pirates, terrorists - they can all multiply their force through the use of unlawfully acquired firepower. The illicit circulation of small
arms, light weapons and their ammunition destabilizes communities, and impacts security and development in all regions of the world.
A worldwide scourge
The illicit trade in small arms, light weapons and ammunition wreaks havoc everywhere. Mobs terrorizing a neighbourhood. Rebels attacking civilians or peacekeepers.
Drug lords randomly killing law enforcers or anyone else interfering with their illegal businesses. Bandits hijacking humanitarian aid convoys. In all continents,
uncontrolled small arms form a persisting problem. READ FOR YOURSELF HERE
COMMON SENSE IMPLEMENTED: First, where does the United Nations (UN) get the right to interfere with a Sovereign People (Americans) and our RIGHTS? By
their own words "ILLICIT TRADE" they are saying there is NO PROTECTION for the people, but yet they want to take the weapons that LAW ABIDING PEOPLE
would have for protection of self and their family. Carefully read the above two paragraphs which are directly from UNODA, link above. Now really think about this
for a moment and answer this question: Do you really think a ban on small arms will keep you safe from "ILLICIT GUN TRADE"? Do you think this illicit trade will
stop? Now think about "Fast and Furious", the US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT GAVE WEAPONS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL, really think about that for
a moment. Do you really want only the GOVERNMENT AND THE DRUG LORDS OR LAW BREAKERS TO HAVE GUNS?
There is going to be another vote in March on the UN Small Arms Gun Ban. Contrast this against Switzerland that has the lowest crime rate in the world, is it because
their guns are banned? No, it is just the opposite, every home has a rifle and/or a handgun, that is at least about 99% of them, contrast that with Chicago that has some
of the most stringent gun laws in the country and crime is very high, and look at what Australia has to say since their guns have been banned VIDEO
NO AMERICAN should be supporting this or any ban on weapons of any kind in our country, and if they do , they are NOT AMERICANS in the true sense of the
word, because it is not only our Bill of Rights, but it is also COMMON SENSE for our own protection. There are Americans that are US citizens only to conduct
commerce; then there are US citizens that are married to the system in ideology and perhaps even took an Oath to the UNITED NATIONS, and in their mind it
supersedes their Constitutional Oath to the people, such as politicians and provocateurs to do their bidding (Agent (Provocateur Law & Legal Definition ... Disrupt the
activities of radical political groups in the U.S)
We already have all the laws we need against criminals having guns, but yet they still have them, and they still will if they are banned. Has anyone heard of the 'Black
Market'! Look back at history, the first act that took place before complete tyranny of the people BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT was a banning of guns, the ability
to protect themselves. Contrary to what some people choose to believe this CAN happen in America and is.
If common sense doesn't speak to your heart, then let me share this information:
- "Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled
that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate."
With this ruling the DEFACTO UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT would once again be ignoring the LAW if they attempt to enact the UNITED
NATIONS Small Arms Treaty that is in conflict with our Constitutional BILL OF RIGHTS that BIND THE OVER-STEPPING REACH OF THE GOVERNMENT
against the American people. Then follow the above case with the below information:
:
- BLACK, J., Judgment of the Court - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 354 U.S. 1 - Reid v. Covert
Article VI, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, declares:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . .
There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution.
Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result. These debates, as
well as the history that surrounds the adoption of the treaty provision in Article VI, make it clear that the reason treaties were not limited to those made in
"pursuance" of the Constitution was so that agreements made by the United States under the Articles of Confederation, including the important peace treaties
which concluded the Revolutionary [p17] War, would remain in effect. [n31] It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the
Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights -- let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition -- to construe Article
VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. [n32] In effect, such
construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to
all branches of the National Government, and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and the Senate combined.
There is nothing new or unique about what we say here. This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.
[n33] For example, in Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267, it declared:
- The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action
of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended
that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the [p18] government, or in that of one of the States,
or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.
This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which must comply with the Constitution, is on a full parity with a treaty, and that,
when a statute which is subsequent in time is inconsistent with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict renders the treaty null. [n34] It would be completely
anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute that must conform to that
instrument. Reference
So, how do we combat such blatant corruption of our BILL OF RIGHTS by those that are suppose to be protecting them? Well, here is one way that people are taking
action. This was sent to me today:
From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 6:24 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: this is going to my local boards, give me your input
The below should be done in every twp and county and state.
February 8 2013
TO Newberg Township and Cass County Board Commissioners,
A open request to adopt An ordnance prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the
Organic Constitution of the United States.
“ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable.”
NOTE: The term in the Second Amendment, “A Well Regulated Militia.” Well regulated has nothing whatsoever to do with any type of
government control!
The term means that you are “proficient in the use of your arms!”
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site (http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html) along with a lot of other good
information.
home page http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us
Some food for thought in some other Nations where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon and ammunition in every home and
they are required to attend regular training the crime is near non existent, Switzerland is one and they have the lowest crime rate in the
world.
This is what it takes people, we are the solution, and its right where we are, and we must, with RESOLVE demand our RIGHTS be protected, and. what good is the
UN Small Arms Ban if each local township, city and/or state has laws making it null and void? The same can be done for all the other atrocities that are being carried
out on the American people. We...the people, which is "of, by, and for the people" can get it done if we come together in our own communities to protect our own
RIGHTS. It is lawful, and our DUTY to do so, reference "The Declaration of Independence:
- The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes
which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in
such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence,
indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to
suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they
are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty,
to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.— Such has
been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great
Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a
candid world." [ Read the Facts by scrolling down on the DOI Document]
My final note is, I pray every American will ponder the information presented and each individual will search their heart for TRUTH and stand on that truth, because
that is what separated America from the rest of the world, not the US Government, but the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE and the RIGHTS given to us by OUR CREATOR.
This is why so many migrated to America, something that most all natural Americans do not understand, but soon will if this self-destructive course we're on is not
diverted.
A very wise person said, "The cork won't pop until pressure is applied at the bottom". Are we going to lawfully and peaceably "pop the cork" and "release our freedom
out of the hands of those that are attempting to take them, instead of honoring their oaths to protect them? <><
February 05, 2013 NULLIFICATION DENIERS: WHAT JAMES MADISON REALLY SAID By Publius Huldah
- -----Original Message-----
From: isaiah
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:11 PM
To: publiushuldah@gmail.com
Subject: NULLIFICATION DENIERS: WHAT JAMES MADISON REALLY SAID
I see several writers on this news site talking about the organic constitution . The issuer you fail to see is the fact that the constitution is not in control or law at
this time!. You are living under a corporate charter, see act of 1871, and the Emergency war powers Act of 1933!!
The criminals in Washington DISTRICT OF CRIMINALS are not going to give up their GRAVY TRAIN . The only thing that can be done is the people all have
to come together and enforce the Declaration of Independence and abolish this whole and complete form of government and start over new.
Article: Nullification Deniers: What James Madison Really Said posted on NewsWithViews.com
This is The Age of Ignorance. Our “intellectuals” can’t think. Our “scholars” parrot each other. The self-educated fixate on idiotic theories. Our People despise
Truth and disseminate lies.
Nullification deniers such as Matthew Spalding of Heritage Foundation, Jarrett Stepman of Human Events, law professor Randy Barnett, David Barton of
Wallbuilders, and history professor Allen C. Guelzo, say that nullification by States of unconstitutional acts of the federal government is unlawful and impossible.
They make the demonstrably false assertions that:
• States don’t have the right to nullify unconstitutional acts of the federal government because our Constitution doesn’t say they can do it;
• Nullification is literally impossible;
• The supreme Court is the final authority on what is constitutional and what is not; and The States and The People must submit to whatever the supreme Court
says; and
• James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, opposed nullification.
Their assertions contradict our Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, our federal Constitution, and what James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and
Alexander Hamilton really said. CONTINUE READING
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EXTREME CAUTION BANKSTER ALERT!
----- Original Message -----
From: Teri H
To: Teri H
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:11 PM
Subject: EXTREME CAUTION, BANKSTER ALERT!
Today a friend called to say that when his wife went down to their bank, Nashville Bank in Tenn. to renew the equity line of credit on their home she came home and
told him to go up to the bank and sign the papers. His name has never been on the loan so he went to the bank to straighten everything out. When he got there and he
was given the papers his wife had signed he found that on the bottom of every page in BOLD type it said that:
BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN REGARD TO ANY AND ALL EVENTS AND OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY
ARISE FROM IT
Fortunately my friend is far to savvy to have fallen for that. He threw a fit and demanded the bank explain what they thought they were trying to pull. The loan officer
called the main branch and then said, well we could take that off of there....( DUH! )
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN ANY DOCUMENT WITH EVEN SIMILAR LANGUAGE TO THAT ON IT. By signing that agreement they would
have been waiving all their rights to due process under the law and our Constitution. If the smaller banks like Nashville Bank are attempting this kind of entrapment you
can bet the BIG BANKS LED THE WAY!
If you have inadvertently signed such a document in the last three days get your butt back down to the bank and exercise your three day right to rescission!
This is unconscionable and cannot be tolerated. If the fraudster banks can get you to renew your loans and or mortgages with language like that in the documents they
have carte blanche ability to STEAL EVERYTHING YOU HAVE and you have NO POWER TO STOP THEM AND NO RECOURSE AFTERWARD!
--
Teri
"A nation...cannot survive treason from within...the traitor ...wears the face of his victims,...and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He
rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared......." Cicero, 42 B.C.E.
February 04, 2013 Henson Ong at Gun Violence Prevention Public Hearing - Hartford, CT - VIDEO
Mr. Ong is a Legal Immigrant that CHOSE to become an American. Please watch/listen to the video (link above) and learn. He showed up to support his chosen
country and defend the RIGHTS he has as an American citizen. We...the people that are natural born to our rights haven't a clue why they are in place or exactly what
they mean and how important they are, but those that were born in other countries completely understand and are standing to defend them. It is time all people stand
together and set aside our differences to understand what TRUE FREEDOM looks like for everyone. The defacto corporate system created this division and continues
to do so to keep our focus off them and what they doing. It's not working for them anymore, people have had enough! Please WATCH
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
New York State Resistance
With no soundtrack - Complete 33 minute video is here - Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the Arms Bill
[This is how it is done folks, but we have to show up to the meetings in numbers. We have the power of the people. Also, a reference is made to "brown shirts" for
those that are younger and do not know what this reference is, since so much history has been removed from textbooks, he is referring to Hitler's Brown Shirt, NAZI
POLICE FORCE. WATCH VIDEO]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Former Michigan Supreme Court Justice Diane Hathaway pleads guilty to bank fraud READ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RONALD REAGAN SPEECH
Ronald Reagan's church put this together to commemorate the birthday of Ronald Reagan.
Boy, how far have WE slipped in just a few short years! VIDEO
~submitted by DF
[My thought: This is an excellent speech and every American should listen to it a few times, then go to the Video Resource (fifth down on page), and watch the video
of JFK's speech, contrast the two and what they are saying. Since President Reagan, our country's values have slide into the gutter, and corruption is at all levels for all
to see and no action is taken against it, except to make laws taking the rights from the virtuous people that do not need them. The people can restore value to our
nation by restoring Almighty God and giving His Commandments back to the people, and mainly our children. We...the people can do it by restoring our religious
values, and at the same time our de jure republic in our local communities. The people at the local levels need to kick out the UN agenda that is being implemented by
the defacto US Corporate government. We, the people need to stand shoulder to shoulder defending our RIGHTS, ALL OF OUR RIGHTS FOR ALL PEOPLE. We
must defend all the Rights and not just the ones that individually we are partial to. All our rights stand, or all our rights will most certainly fall, and they are for all
people, because if all are not free, nobody is truly free<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
To: xxxxx xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:03 AM
Subject: ... Too Great not to Share [this email had numerous pictures that could not be shared here due to space, and the message was to pray for our military because
of this below statement:]
- The ACLU has filed a suit to end prayer from the military completely. They're making great progress.. The Navy Chaplains
can no longer mention Jesus' name in prayer thanks to the ACLU and others.
[The senders comment:]
It is very apparent that the ACLU is more interested in pushing an atheistic agenda instead of being truly concerned
with our rights. Keep this prayer request moving through your email list.
~submitted by Steve
[My thought and reply: The ACLU would not be able to do this if the people in the military protested against it, until the people stop allowing this usurpation of their
rights it will continue. Ronald Reagan said this about our First Amendment:
- "The First Amendment was not written to protect people and their laws from religious values, it was written to
protect those values from government tyranny." WATCH VIDEO
The "people:" are key to everything, just as the defacto is attempting another gun grab they will continue to completely remove Almighty God as well, but they can only
do this if the people will NOT STAND AND DEFEND THEIR RIGHTS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEIR FAITH AND THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS IT!!.
We can pray for our military as most do, but ultimately it is only within their power to change it, and might I add they take an oath to uphold the Constitution, but yet
they are allowing their own FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to be taken, or someone else's of a different faith. It is those that are directly affected by these edicts that
need to stand up and say "NO", just as it was when parents allowed prayer to be taken out of our schools, now look at the mess they are in, they can't learn the Ten
Commandments but they can learn how to properly apply a condom, such disgrace to our country, and the education of our children.<><]
February 01, 2013 A Letter From The SPECIAL FORCES COMMUNITY Concerning The Second Amendment
Excerpt from the letter:
- “The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny. Consider the
words of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story”: ‘The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the
subject. The militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by
rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous
expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample
upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it
offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the
people to resist and triumph over them."
- "So, what do we believe will be effective? First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control problem; it is a complex sociological problem. No
single course of action will solve the problem. Therefore, it is our recommendation that a series of diverse steps be undertaken, the implementation of which will
require patience and diligence to realize an effect. These are as follows:
1. First and foremost we support our Second Amendment right in that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the
people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.
2. We support State and Local School Boards in their efforts to establish security protocols in whatever manner and form that they deem necessary and
adequate. One of the great strengths of our Republic is that State and Local governments can be creative in solving problems. Things that work can be shared.
Our point is that no one knows what will work and there is no one single solution, so let’s allow the State and Local governments with the input of the citizens
to make the decisions. Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first district in North Texas to consider allowing some teachers
to carry concealed guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do support their right to make this decision for themselves.
3. We recommend that Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) laws be passed in every State. AOT is formerly known as Involuntary Outpatient Commitment
(IOC) and allows the courts to order certain individuals with mental disorders to comply with treatment while living in the community. In each of the mass
shooting incidents the perpetrator was mentally unstable. We also believe that people who have been adjudicated as incompetent should be simultaneously
examined to determine whether they should be allowed the right to retain/purchase firearms.
4. We support the return of firearm safety programs to schools along the lines of the successful “Eddie the Eagle” program, which can be taught in schools by
Peace Officers or other trained professionals.
5. Recent social psychology research clearly indicates that there is a direct relationship between gratuitously violent movies/video games and desensitization to
real violence and increased aggressive behavior particularly in children and young adults (See Nicholas L. Carnagey, et al. 2007. “The effect of video game
violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence” and the references therein. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:489-496). Therefore, we
strongly recommend that gratuitous violence in movies and video games be discouraged. War and war-like behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video
game producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman famously said “War is Hell!” Leave war to the Professionals. War is not a
game and should not be “sold” as entertainment to our children.
6. We support repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. This may sound counter-intuitive, but it obviously isn’t working. It is our opinion that “Gun-
Free Zones” anywhere are too tempting of an environment for the mentally disturbed individual to inflict their brand of horror with little fear of interference.
While governmental and non-governmental organizations, businesses, and individuals should be free to implement a Gun-Free Zone if they so choose, they
should also assume Tort liability for that decision.
7. We believe that border states should take responsibility for implementation of border control laws to prevent illegal shipments of firearms and drugs. Drugs
have been illegal in this country for a long, long time yet the Federal Government manages to seize only an estimated 10% of this contraband at our borders.
Given this dismal performance record that is misguided and inept (“Fast and Furious”), we believe that border States will be far more competent at this mission.
8. This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate that
responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our principles and
act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.
The undersigned Quiet Professionals hereby humbly stand ever present, ever ready, and ever vigilant.
1100 Green Berets Signed this Letter
We have a list of all their names and unlike any MSM outlets we can confirm that over 1100 Green Berets did sign. The list includes Special Forces Major
Generals & Special Forces Command Sergeants Major down to the lowest ranking “Green Beret”. [Read Entire Letter Here: LINK PDF]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who is Our Sheriff Working For?
When a society allows its political leaders to pass unjust laws the people suffer. When only just laws are enforced, the people's lives, liberty and property are respected.
In a where just laws prevail the result is peace, prosperity and freedom.
In a society that embraces only just laws the court system promotes equal justice, but when unjust laws are passed and enforced injustice prevails and the Courts
destroy the justice they were created to provide..When unjust laws become commonplace the government becomes the usurper of power and begins to extend special
benefits and privileges to certain groups and individuals at the expense others.
Any law that violates the principles spelled out in the Constitution are unjust. The Sheriffs have been elected to protect our rights and were to be the guardians of our
liberty and the defender of our Constitution. It was stated years ago that it is sometimes necessary for a patriot to defend his country from his government. The
Constitution was written to control the government not to control the people.
A County Sheriff must decide whether he or she will honor their oath or be an administrative assistant to the President of the United States. The Sheriff can not serve
two masters. He must take his marching orders from the people or the President.. It is up to us to elect righteous men or women to serve as our County Sheriff.
As a resident of the county, we have a right to know if our Sheriff had their fingers crossed when they promised to uphold the Constitution. We need to contact every
single County Sheriff in the land and find out who they are working for.
~submitted by WRAM
n of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was wondering if you were going to join these Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country that have
stated such? One Un-Constitutional mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example. Specifically, "assault
rifles" which is a bogus label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would qualify as an "assault rifle" in operation. You and I know the
legislation will include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have seen them do in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a
statement to the Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful laws
against the Citizens of your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that elected duty. I also encourage you to belong to CSPOA www.
constitutionpreservation.org/constitution-preservation/cspoa-bill-rights-presentation Please write me back with your views on this matter as I would hate to be one of
many Citizens in other counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with violating their Sworn Oath of Office and kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank
you for your diligence on this matter.
Sincerely,
xxx xxxxx
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Nx5MJNINQ
www.newswithviews.com/Gilbertson/gil103.htm
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5390
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
-----------------------------
- Reply:
From: Chuck Vondra <vondrac@charlevoixcounty.org>
To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
Sent: Fri, January 25, 2013 1:42:16 PM
Subject: RE: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
xxx,
As far as I am concerned this is real simple. We abide by the oath we have taken to uphold the constitution of this state and the United States . We are not
federal agents and do not take direction from them. My boss is the elected Sheriff of Charlevoix County. We follow the laws that empower him as Sheriff.
Chuck
- From: xxxxxx xxxxxx
To: Chuck Vondra
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
Chuck,
Thank you for your timely response. I appreciate your answers. What or where exactly are those "laws that empower him as Sheriff"? Could I find a copy of
those somewhere? Did you receive the booklet I left at your office awhile back, about The Constitutional Sheriff written by Ex-Sheriff Richard Mack? Have you
had a chance to read it? What did you think of the booklet, and these enclosed links of the original e-mail I just sent? Are you willing to join a group like CSPOA?
Thanks for your time Chuck, I appreciate it. xxx
"We...the people" of Michigan
have inhabited our FREE DE JURE STATE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |